| Andy |
OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
"Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
are the mad cows from?"
I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
Moo.
Andy
|
|
|
| dave |
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:26:54 -0500, Andy <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote:
>OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
>
>"Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
>are the mad cows from?"
>
>I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
>
>It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
>
>Moo.
>
>Andy
It sounds like you did but I've done the same thing. Are you in CA?
Dave G
|
|
|
| PENMART01 |
>Andy writes:
>
>"Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
>are the mad cows from?"
Madness does not negate happiness, in fact just the opposite.
---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
|
|
|
| Andy |
dave <dave@dave.com> wrote in news:a10sj0lgg1ojlaldmv9qnq5o84n6vi831f@
4ax.com:
> It sounds like you did but I've done the same thing. Are you in CA?
>
I used to be. This ad campaign is playing in Philly, PA, where I see it.
Andy
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On 07 Sep 2004 18:45:14 GMT, PENMART01 <penmart01@aol.como> wrote:
>
>
>>Andy writes:
>>
>>"Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
>>are the mad cows from?"
>
> Madness does not negate happiness, in fact just the opposite.
>
www.madcowboy.com
>
> ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
> ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
> *********
> "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
> Sheldon
> ````````````
Boycott America for repeatedly invading other people's countries and
committing mass murder and destruction there.
AC
|
|
|
| Nexis |
"Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:J9idndAlWqHzYKDcRVn-tA@giganews.com...
> OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
>
> "Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
> are the mad cows from?"
>
> I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
>
> It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
>
> Moo.
>
> Andy
Reading too much into it? I'd say so. Happy cows, as a slogan, has nothing
to do with Mad Cow disease or lack thereof. Have you ever driven through the
rolling green hills of northern CA, and seen the cows with their panoramic
views of the ocean, the forests, the beaches and the cliffs? I'd be pretty
damn happy too.
kimberly
|
|
|
| Andy |
"Nexis" <nexis1@cox.net> wrote in news:JDo%c.106338$4o.63264@fed1read01:
>
> "Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:J9idndAlWqHzYKDcRVn-tA@giganews.com...
>> OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
>>
>> "Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well,
>> where are the mad cows from?"
>>
>> I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
>>
>> It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
>>
>> Moo.
>>
>> Andy
>
> Reading too much into it? I'd say so. Happy cows, as a slogan, has
> nothing to do with Mad Cow disease or lack thereof. Have you ever
> driven through the rolling green hills of northern CA, and seen the
> cows with their panoramic views of the ocean, the forests, the beaches
> and the cliffs? I'd be pretty damn happy too.
>
kimberly,
You're probably right. But somebody came up with the slogan for a reason.
Now we all know there is no such thing as a "happy cow."
I don't recall the coastal cows, but on I-5 north of Bakersfield, there
are a few pityful cow ranches on the way. I can't speak for them, but
they didn't look very happy, imho.
Andy
|
|
|
| Lou-Lou |
Are you talking about the one where Bobcat Goldthwaite is the voice of the
rooster?
"Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:qv6dndwSGK9TmqPcRVn-pQ@giganews.com...
> dave <dave@dave.com> wrote in news:a10sj0lgg1ojlaldmv9qnq5o84n6vi831f@
> 4ax.com:
>
>> It sounds like you did but I've done the same thing. Are you in CA?
>>
>
> I used to be. This ad campaign is playing in Philly, PA, where I see it.
>
> Andy
|
|
|
| Puester |
Andy wrote:
>
>
> You're probably right. But somebody came up with the slogan for a reason.
> Now we all know there is no such thing as a "happy cow."
>
In order to sell happy cheese?
Many years ago the Carnation company (IIRC) advertised their
canned milk as "milk from contented cows."
gloria p
|
|
|
| Charles Gifford |
"Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:BpWdnfJCEIz4haPcRVn-gg@giganews.com...
> "Nexis" <nexis1@cox.net> wrote in news:JDo%c.106338$4o.63264@fed1read01:
>
>
> I don't recall the coastal cows, but on I-5 north of Bakersfield, there
> are a few pityful cow ranches on the way. I can't speak for them, but
> they didn't look very happy, imho.
>
> Andy
Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the largest
concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are undoubtedly
NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR, do look happy.
OTOH, the commercials are funny.
Charliam
|
|
|
| pennyaline |
"Charles Gifford" writes:
>> "Andy" writes:
>> I don't recall the coastal cows, but on I-5 north of Bakersfield, there
>> are a few pityful cow ranches on the way. I can't speak for them, but
>> they didn't look very happy, imho.
>>
>> Andy
>
> Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
> along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the
largest
> concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are
undoubtedly
> NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR, do look happy.
> OTOH, the commercials are funny.
>
> Charliam
But wasn't it established long ago that the best dairy cows are not in fact
happy, just contented.
<"You work out?">
|
|
|
| sf |
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:26:54 -0500, Andy <nospm@nowhere.com>
wrote:
> OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
I think your sense of humor needs tweeking.
>
> "Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
> are the mad cows from?"
You are morose! Mad cow isn't an issue here.
>
> I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
Wrong, we don't have enough beef to go around with all the
low carb dieters gobbling it up.
>
> It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
>
> Moo.
>
Those commercials are laughing out loud funny and I haven't
tired of them! You want cerebral humor, read a book.
sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments
|
|
|
| Christopher Green |
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:15:23 GMT, "Charles Gifford"
<taxicolor@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>"Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:BpWdnfJCEIz4haPcRVn-gg@giganews.com...
>> "Nexis" <nexis1@cox.net> wrote in news:JDo%c.106338$4o.63264@fed1read01:
>>
>>
>> I don't recall the coastal cows, but on I-5 north of Bakersfield, there
>> are a few pityful cow ranches on the way. I can't speak for them, but
>> they didn't look very happy, imho.
That's the Harris Ranch feedlot ("Cowschwitz"). They might be even
less happy if they were able to reflect on their fate (which you can
enjoy at the Harris Ranch restaurant just outside Coalinga).
>Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
>along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the largest
>concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are undoubtedly
>NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR, do look happy.
>OTOH, the commercials are funny.
The dairy belt actually extends a little further north, into Merced
and Stanislaus counties. Tulare county is the top producing county,
followed by those two. The largest single dairy operation, Gallo
Cattle Co., is in Atwater (Merced county). (Yes, that's Joseph Gallo,
the Gallo who lost the trademark war with his brothers.)
And since each of those cows earns her keep by producing more than ten
tons of milk a year, they are much too busy to be lollygagging around
with talking roosters.
--
Chris Green
|
|
|
| PENMART01 |
>"Andy" moos:
>>
>Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
>along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield.
Um, wouldn't that be in LA, along Santa Monica Blvd.?
>The cows are undoubtedly NOT happy cows.
With all that Botex it's difficult to tell.
---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
|
|
|
| Mike Carvin |
"sf" <nobody@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jobtj012thh88tediqjvfp839hfklmb2at@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:26:54 -0500, Andy <nospm@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
>
> > "Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well,
where
> > are the mad cows from?"
>
> You are morose! Mad cow isn't an issue here.
<TONGUEINCHEEK>
As to where the mad cows are from... they come from Arkansas, and then move
on to become junior senators from New York. ;-) ;-)
</TONGUEINCHEEK>
MikeC
|
|
|
| notbob |
On 2004-09-07, Charles Gifford <taxicolor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
> along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the largest
> concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are undoubtedly
> NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR, do look happy.
> OTOH, the commercials are funny.
Actually, the whole Central Valley is lousy with dairy farms clear up to
Sacramento from the Sierra foothills to the Coastal Range. There are so
many, in fact, the State Air Resources Board considers the emissions from
dairy farms (cow manure) to be a major pollutant. The manure output from a
single farm is so prodigious there is no use for it all and it must be
stored on site in huge towering mounds covered with plastic sheeting weighed
down with old tire carcasses.
Almost none of these farms is even remotely like the idyllic setting
pictured on tv. Most all of them are crowded corrals adjacent to an outside
feeding shed. The cows stand around in knee high mud and dung most of their
lives and are fed a constant diet of anitbiotics so as not to suffer
crippling foot infections. I won't bother going into the dirty politics
and consumer deception behind the bovine growth hormone (BGH) horror.
http://www.unhappycows.com/
I don't know if cows can be happy or sad and I'm no PETA zealot. In fact, I
think PETA is a buncha alarmist nutjobs. But, they are telling it like it
is with respect to "happy cows" in CA. I've seen these farms all my life
and I can't help feeling a bit sad for CA dairy cows. Even CA beef cattle get
to wonder around some nice grazing land before they meet their maker. CA
dairy cows lead a ****ty life ...literally.
nb
|
|
|
| Karen O'Mara |
Andy <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<J9idndAlWqHzYKDcRVn-tA@giganews.com>...
> OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
>
> "Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
> are the mad cows from?"
>
> I'm guessing California has their share of mad cow disease.
>
> It just chaps my hide sometimes. Or did I read more into it?
>
> Moo.
>
> Andy
I didn't even think about the mad cows out there.
I am pretty sure the Happy Cow campaign came out before the mad cow
scares. And, wouldn't the opposite of Happy Cows be angry cows, not
mad cows, anymoooo?
The commercials always crack me up.
Karen
|
|
|
| Blair P. Houghton |
Andy <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote:
>OK, so I get bent on bad TV commercials.
>
>"Happy Cows are from California" just begs the viewer to ask "Well, where
>are the mad cows from?"
Canadia.
--Blair
"Which is part French, so it's obvious."
|
|
|
| pennyaline |
"Mike Carvin" wrote:
> <TONGUEINCHEEK>
>
> As to where the mad cows are from... they come from Arkansas, and then
move
> on to become junior senators from New York. ;-) ;-)
>
> </TONGUEINCHEEK>
You mean they come from Chicago, then move to Arkansas, etc.
|
|
|
| Andy |
"Mike Carvin" <bari428@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:chn5ms$lii$1@transfer.stratus.com:
> <TONGUEINCHEEK>
>
> As to where the mad cows are from... they come from Arkansas, and then
> move on to become junior senators from New York. ;-) ;-)
>
> </TONGUEINCHEEK>
>
Mike,
Don't they also come from San Francisco, under the Fienstine brand?
Andy
|
|
|
| ConnieG999 |
"Charles Gifford" <taxicolor@earthlink.net> writes:
>OTOH, the commercials are funny.
My favorite is the one where they get their foot massage from a small
earthquake and lament that it's over far too fast.
Connie
**************************************************
***
My mind is like a steel...um, whatchamacallit.
|
|
|
| Terry Pulliam Burd |
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:59:47 -0600, "pennyaline"
<nsmitchell@spamspamspamspamspamqwestandspam.com> arranged random
neurons, so they looked like this:
"Charles Gifford" writes:
> Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
> along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the
>largest concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are
>undoubtedly NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR, do look happy.
> OTOH, the commercials are funny.
Charlie, Bill's (the DH) father lived in Hemet for years and we drove
from Orange County to Hemet any old number of times. There are a TON
of dairy farms out that way, way east of the 15 off the Ramona
Expressway. On warm days, the stench as you travel through nearly
makes your eyes water. The cows might be happy, but I can't imagine
anyone else is. There was a defunct restaurant on the Ramona Expwy.
that's been abandoned for years, right in the middle of dairy-land.
Cannot imagine who might have thought it a good idea to put a
restaurant in the middle all that cow stink. Yech.
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA
"I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity." (Dubyuh)
To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"
|
|
|
| Donna Rose |
In article <20040909004830.21022.00000383@mb-m20.aol.com>,
connieg999@aol.com says...
> "Charles Gifford" <taxicolor@earthlink.net> writes:
>
> >OTOH, the commercials are funny.
>
> My favorite is the one where they get their foot massage from a small
> earthquake and lament that it's over far too fast.
>
Mine is the one where the two cows are trying to decide whether to mow
the back 40 or not, one says to the other, 'oh let's hit the snooze alarm
for a bit' and you see the rooster come flying out of the barn.
--
Donna
A pessimist believes all women are bad. An optimist hopes they are.
|
|
|
| Charles Gifford |
"Terry Pulliam Burd" <ntpulliam@spaminator.net> wrote in message
news:de12k0p1nam24ohdvpov8c8er7oqv3bvki@4ax.com...
>
> "Charles Gifford" writes:
>
> > Most of California's milk cows are located in Tulare and Kings counties
> > along highway 99 and across to I-5 north of Bakersfield. This is the
> >largest concentration of milk cows and dairies in the U.S. The cows are
> >undoubtedly NOT happy cows. Now the cows on the farms in Tillamook, OR,
do look happy.
> > OTOH, the commercials are funny.
>
> Charlie, Bill's (the DH) father lived in Hemet for years and we drove
> from Orange County to Hemet any old number of times. There are a TON
> of dairy farms out that way, way east of the 15 off the Ramona
> Expressway. On warm days, the stench as you travel through nearly
> makes your eyes water. The cows might be happy, but I can't imagine
> anyone else is. There was a defunct restaurant on the Ramona Expwy.
> that's been abandoned for years, right in the middle of dairy-land.
> Cannot imagine who might have thought it a good idea to put a
> restaurant in the middle all that cow stink. Yech.
Yep. My sister lives in Hemet. There are lots of cows there -- they probably
moved up from Sandy Eggo and down from Riverside when the former farm areas
there were replaced with housing. As Temecula and Hemet grow ever closer
together, the cattle will probably disappear there too! However, the number
of cows in the Hemet area is miniscule compared with Tulare and King
Counties.The huge number of dairy cattle in these Central California
counties is actually rather recent as far as such things go.
Charlie
|
|
|
| blake murphy |
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:52:02 GMT, Christopher Green <cj.green@att.net>
wrote:
>
>That's the Harris Ranch feedlot ("Cowschwitz").
this is too funny.
your pal,
blake
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:52:02 GMT, Christopher Green <cj.green@att.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:15:23 GMT, "Charles Gifford"
><taxicolor@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Andy" <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>news:BpWdnfJCEIz4haPcRVn-gg@giganews.com...
>>> "Nexis" <nexis1@cox.net> wrote in news:JDo%c.106338$4o.63264@fed1read01:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't recall the coastal cows, but on I-5 north of Bakersfield, there
>>> are a few pityful cow ranches on the way. I can't speak for them, but
>>> they didn't look very happy, imho.
>
> That's the Harris Ranch feedlot ("Cowschwitz").
!funny :-)
> They might be even
> less happy if they were able to reflect on their fate (which you can
> enjoy at the Harris Ranch restaurant just outside Coalinga).
>
*You* could. The human body loses its ability to digest animal products
completely in 6 months to a year, because it doesn't do it naturally.
If I ate any of that stuff it would just make me sick and pass through.
But I wasn't quite accurate in that first statement: The human body never
really learns to digest animal products. That's why you have all those
flakes and bits of meat rotting in the crevices of your colon and causing
all sorts of health problems.
<snip>
AC
|
|
|
| ConnieG999 |
Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> writes:
>But I wasn't quite accurate in that first statement: The human body never
>really learns to digest animal products. That's why you have all those
>flakes and bits of meat rotting in the crevices of your colon and causing
>all sorts of health problems.
Oh, boy, another crackpot who believes that nonsense.
Obviously you've never truly educated yourself on the physiology of the human
body.
So you just go on having your high colonics and reading the garbage on the
scare-mongers' sites.
I bet you believe you have crayons from kindergarten hiding in your colon too.
Connie
**************************************************
***
My mind is like a steel...um, whatchamacallit.
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On 11 Sep 2004 19:56:11 GMT, ConnieG999 <connieg999@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> writes:
>
>>But I wasn't quite accurate in that first statement: The human body never
>>really learns to digest animal products. That's why you have all those
>>flakes and bits of meat rotting in the crevices of your colon and causing
>>all sorts of health problems.
>
>
> Oh, boy, another crackpot who believes that nonsense.
> Obviously you've never truly educated yourself on the physiology of the human
> body.
People who want to know the truth here can find it on Google. Easily.
> So you just go on having your high colonics and reading the garbage on the
> scare-mongers' sites.
I've never had a 'high colonic' and don't need any websites to tell me
what is obvious.
Try this little experiment: Go find a pure vegetarian and both of you
take a **** and have people come by and smell each of the piles.
One pile smells truly awful, like rotting roadkill.
One smells a *lot* better. Not good, but it doesn't smell *sick*.
Now take samples of each to a local laboratory and have them write
up a report on the number and variety of pathogens found in each
respective sample. And the amount of old, un-digested meat fragments
that are in your ****. They are there, I assure you. Some of them
weeks old.
But you won't do this because you aren't interested in facts, just in
attacking anyone who points out that your diet is not really a very
good one from a health perspective (not the best choice).
(The WHO classifies the solid wastes of meat eaters as a health hazard,
but not the solid wastes of pure vegetarians. That *ought* to tell
you something.)
Then there's the fact that you diet is extremely environmentally
destructive: Just for *starters*, you need at least 3-1/2 acres to
grow the plants that the animals you eat consume. A pure vegetarian
can live off of less than 1/10 acre.
Guess you don't like facing that either.
Then there's the fact that it takes 12 pounds of grain to produce one
pound of meat, which you then consume while millions of children die
of starvation around the world.
Your lifestyle stinks like your ****, and what comes out of your mouth
is the verbal equivalent.
<snip>
www.madcowboy.com
www.earthsave.org
AC
|
|
|
| pennyaline |
"Alan Connor" writes:
> People who want to know the truth here can find it on Google. Easily.
I'm confident that you believe that.
> I've never had a 'high colonic' and don't need any websites to tell me
> what is obvious.
>
> Try this little experiment: Go find a pure vegetarian and both of you
> take a **** and have people come by and smell each of the piles.
>
> One pile smells truly awful, like rotting roadkill.
>
> One smells a *lot* better. Not good, but it doesn't smell *sick*.
I grew up around cows and horses, chickens and ducks, pigs and goats...
The cow flop smelled a lot like horse flop, but the cows were being fed
(wait for it...) ground up cow! The horses were *not* being fed ground up
horsey. It all smelled like grass and hay to me. Still does.
Chicken and duck crap, on the other hand, smells evil. Utterly, entirely
evil.
> Now take samples of each to a local laboratory and have them write
> up a report on the number and variety of pathogens found in each
> respective sample. And the amount of old, un-digested meat fragments
> that are in your ****. They are there, I assure you. Some of them
> weeks old.
"Old meat fragments" are not "pathogens" by anyone's definition. Undigested
protein will continue to breakdown naturally in the colon and be swept out
with other contents. Of course they are there, you moron. Where else would
they be?
> But you won't do this because you aren't interested in facts, just in
> attacking anyone who points out that your diet is not really a very
> good one from a health perspective (not the best choice).
I won't do it because I don't want to be laughed out of the joint.
> (The WHO classifies the solid wastes of meat eaters as a health hazard,
> but not the solid wastes of pure vegetarians. That *ought* to tell
> you something.)
The Who? What do they know. Damn hippies!!
Oh. That WHO. Why, no! It doesn't tell me a thing. Why don't you explain.
It's all nitrogenous, all a bomb waiting to happen.
> Then there's the fact that you diet is extremely environmentally
> destructive: Just for *starters*, you need at least 3-1/2 acres to
> grow the plants that the animals you eat consume. A pure vegetarian
> can live off of less than 1/10 acre.
>
> Guess you don't like facing that either.
Where do you get the information to quantify that? Have you ever farmed?
Ranched? Subsistance farmed?
> Then there's the fact that it takes 12 pounds of grain to produce one
> pound of meat, which you then consume while millions of children die
> of starvation around the world.
I knew all the aid we send overseas is just a big waste of time and
resources. That settles it! Let all be vegetarians!
<beat>
They're still starving.
> Your lifestyle stinks like your ****, and what comes out of your mouth
> is the verbal equivalent.
Your **** don't stink?
<come over here and say that>
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:29:58 -0600, pennyaline <nsmitchell@spamspamspamspamspamqwestandspam.com> wrote:
>
>
> "Alan Connor" writes:
>> People who want to know the truth here can find it on Google. Easily.
>
> I'm confident that you believe that.
>
Yes. I believe that Google can lead me to the accurate information on
10's of thousands of subjects. That's what search engines are for.
What do *you* use? Fortune cookies?
Rather than reading any more of your ignorant bitchiness, let's take a
look at what you snipped above:
<quote>
>
>
> Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> writes:
>
>>But I wasn't quite accurate in that first statement: The human body never
>>really learns to digest animal products. That's why you have all those
>>flakes and bits of meat rotting in the crevices of your colon and causing
>>all sorts of health problems.
>
>
> Oh, boy, another crackpot who believes that nonsense.
> Obviously you've never truly educated yourself on the physiology of the human
> body.
People who want to know the truth here can find it on Google. Easily.
</quote>
Those that do search for information on the above subject will learn that
you are as ignorant as you seem to be.
-------------------------------------
On plant-based diets in general:
Although people shouldn't limit themselves to obviously biased sources
like the links below, they are still quite useful:
www.madcowboy.com
www.earthsave.org
I've been a pure vegetarian for about a 1/4 of a century, Penny. And I
am in my 50's and I'll bet I am much healthier than you are.
When was the last time you went to a doctor, Penny?
For me, it was sometime in the 70's.
Do you get colds and the flu, Penny?
I don't.
Do you take medications, Penny? I don't. None. Ever.
<snip>
AC
|
|
|
| Andy |
Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote in news:6dN0d.803$_G4.1
@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> Do you take medications, Penny? I don't. None. Ever.
>
Alan,
You're full of ****.
You are getting medicated/poisoned while you eat.
When you drink OJ? Do you think that the OJ producers actually peel the
skin (pesticide coated) when they make it?
Geez,
Andy
|
|
|
| D. A.'Dutch' Martinich |
Terry Pulliam Burd <ntpulliam@spaminator.net> wrote in message news:<de12k0p1nam24ohdvpov8c8er7oqv3bvki@4ax.com>...
> There was a defunct restaurant on the Ramona Expwy.
> that's been abandoned for years, right in the middle of dairy-land.
> Cannot imagine who might have thought it a good idea to put a
> restaurant in the middle all that cow stink. Yech.
This reminds of a memorable breakfast I once ate in Hanford, CA in the
heart of the Kings/Tulare dairy. On a warm summer morning the whole
area is redolent with dairy. Not a bad smell but defintely earthy
(bordering on poopy). It was about 7am and I decide to check out the
restaurant in the auction yard, having previously had pretty good luck
in such places (eg. Petaluma). I should add that I had probably one
too many Picon punches in the bar at Justo's the night before. Well,
to get to the restaurant, you have to walk through the main entrance
to the yard and the smell will knock you over! But, if you hold your
breath and duck into the restaurant the olfactory bouquet changes
dramatically. The place was full of Azorean-American dairymen smoking
cigars and talking about vacations in Cancun over breakfast. I
ordered what appeared to be the popular combo which was eggs,
potatoes, toast, beans and linguica sausage. Yeah, I was a little
slow when I staggered out of there facing a busy day of taking soil
and water sanples.
DM.
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:42:48 -0500, Andy <nospm@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
> Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote in news:6dN0d.803$_G4.1
> @newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
>> Do you take medications, Penny? I don't. None. Ever.
>>
>
> Alan,
>
> You're full of ****.
>
No. My bowels work fine. Better than yours, I'll bet.
> You are getting medicated/poisoned while you eat.
No.
>
> When you drink OJ? Do you think that the OJ producers actually peel the
> skin (pesticide coated) when they make it?
>
I eat out of my own gardens. Like all addicts, you assume whatever it is
convenient to assume to justify your addiction.
Junkies are the same way, but they do far less harm to the planet than
animal-product consumers do.
> Geez,
>
> Andy
I think that's *my* line, "Andy".
I'm a better planetary citizen than you are, "Andy". I don't trash the
planet to eat and I don't consume many times the calories and protein
I need while millions of children starve.
I'd also wager that I am a lot healthier than you are.
When was the last time you went to a doctor "Andy"?
For me it was in the '70s.
---------
People can listen to ignorant fools who hide behind aliases, or they
can get some real information at these sites:
www.earthsave.org
www.madcowboy.com
---------
You can switch aliases and post bitchy, ignorant crap, worthy of a third
grader with trashy parents, all day long. I don't care.
Just another opportunity to get those URLs into the Usenet Archives.
AC
|
|
|
| pennyaline |
"Alan Connor" wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:29:58 -0600, pennyaline
<nsmitchell@spamspamspamspamspamqwestandspam.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Alan Connor" writes:
> >> People who want to know the truth here can find it on Google. Easily.
> >
> > I'm confident that you believe that.
> >
>
> Yes. I believe that Google can lead me to the accurate information on
> 10's of thousands of subjects. That's what search engines are for.
>
> What do *you* use? Fortune cookies?
You know, I've gotten so many notes from people being held hostage in
fortune cookie factories that I don't know what to believe anymore,
knowwaddamean?
|
|
|
| pennyaline |
"Alan Connor" wrote:
> People can listen to ignorant fools who hide behind aliases, or they
> can get some real information at these sites:
This from zzzzzz@xxx.yyy
> You can switch aliases and post bitchy, ignorant crap, worthy of a third
> grader with trashy parents, all day long. I don't care.
>
> Just another opportunity to get those URLs into the Usenet Archives.
Ooops. I cut them.
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
Well lookey there! The stupid troll is back.
Read one troll-post, read them all, so I'll just pass.
Anyone interested in a diet that is good for their body, their
pocketbook, and the planet, should take a look at these:
www.madcowboy.com
www.earthsave.org
AC
|
|
|
| Pathological Liar |
> I've been a pure vegetarian for about a 1/4 of a century, Penny. And I
> am in my 50's and I'll bet I am much healthier than you are.
>
> When was the last time you went to a doctor, Penny?
>
> For me, it was sometime in the 70's.
>
> Do you get colds and the flu, Penny?
>
> I don't.
>
> Do you take medications, Penny? I don't. None. Ever.
Okay, as long as we're making spurious and completely unverifiable health
claims, here goes:
I am 1338 years old. Not only am I in glowing good health, but I
spontaneously cure all maladies of anybody who comes within 0.618 cubits of
me (more specifically, the range is measured from my pineal gland and is the
square root of 5, minus one, then divided by two). I subsist exclusively on
meat, primarily beef from what is now California, although I vary my diet by
including foie gras, pork, and the occasional ostrich.
"Turbo" Mendacious
|
|
|
| Alan Connor |
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:00:50 GMT, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy>
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:29:58 -0600, pennyaline
> <nsmitchell@spamspamspamspamspamqwestandspam.com> wrote:
>
>
>> "Alan Connor" writes:
>>
>>> People who want to know the truth here can find it on
>>> Google. Easily.
>>
>> I'm confident that you believe that.
>
>
> Yes. I believe that Google can lead me to the accurate
> information on 10's of thousands of subjects. That's what
> search engines are for.
>
> What do *you* use? Fortune cookies?
>
> Rather than reading any more of your ignorant bitchiness, let's
> take a look at what you snipped above:
>
><quote>
>
>
>
>> Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> writes:
>>
>>>But I wasn't quite accurate in that first statement: The human
>>>body never really learns to digest animal products. That's
>>>why you have all those flakes and bits of meat rotting in
>>>the crevices of your colon and causing all sorts of health
>>>problems.
>>
>>
>> Oh, boy, another crackpot who believes that nonsense.
>> Obviously you've never truly educated yourself on the
>> physiology of the human body.
>
> People who want to know the truth here can find it on
> Google. Easily.
>
></quote>
>
> Those that do search for information on the above subject will
> learn that you are as ignorant as you seem to be.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> On plant-based diets in general:
>
> Although people shouldn't limit themselves to obviously biased
> sources like the links below, they are still quite useful:
>
> www.madcowboy.com
>
> www.earthsave.org
>
> I've been a pure vegetarian for about a 1/4 of a century,
> Penny. And I am in my 50's and I'll bet I am much healthier
> than you are.
>
> When was the last time you went to a doctor, Penny?
>
> For me, it was sometime in the 70's.
>
> Do you get colds and the flu, Penny?
>
> I don't.
>
> Do you take medications, Penny? I don't. None. Ever.
>
><snip>
>
> AC
>
>
>
Gee "Pathological"....Don't like what I have to say?
Too bad.
I don't like what you have to say, regardless of what alias you
are using, but *I* have the brains to just not bother to read
your posts.
Have you checked out:
www.madcowboy.com
or
www.earthsave.org
yet?
May as well, considering that you obviously don't have a life.
AC
|
|
|
|
