| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
>
> Andrew, many of the comments others have made on this thread point,
There are (so far) neither many comments nor many participants in this
thread. However, we will rectify that with more crossposting :-)
> as you
> and I have discussed previously, to several of the nutritional flaws in
> the 2 lb diet.
Your logic reminds me of the following driver who has been caught
overspeeding on the highway:
Officer: You were going over 55 mph
Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if I
were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a gun
pointed at my head and was threatening to shoot me if I drove only 55
mph. Or what if I am Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if he
slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
Officer: Do you want me to imagine that you a Keanu Reeves?
Speeder: Yes.
Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
> When next we talk we should incorperate them into the next
> revision of the diet now underway. Are you taking notes?
No. But I am laughing at you :-)
Hope the above analogy enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| wondering@worldnet.com |
"There are (so far) neither many comments nor many participants in this
thread. However, we will rectify that with more crossposting :-)"
Oh Andrew, please do say you are not one of those trolley things. Isn't
that what they call those people who go about doing mischief on the
internet by pushing themselves where not welcome? "Ding, ding goes the
trolley, did you watch Mr. Rodgers when you were young and his trolley
bits where the trolley went in endless circles. Don't dispair, the therad
is young and many will no doubt want to contribute. This diet would be an
excellent part of the revision to your dietary suggesttions, and it
addresses some more goals of health and nutrition that your perscriptive
observations did not reveal. Others have now led you to revise that first
observation and I can just about hear the gears turning now after you have
seen the article in this thread.
"No. But I am laughing at you :-)"
Good, we all have a role to play in enriching the lives of those around
us, laughter is the best medicine, do you know the origin of that phrase?
..
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
>
> "There are (so far) neither many comments nor many participants in this
> thread. However, we will rectify that with more crossposting :-)"
>
> Oh Andrew, please do say you are not one of those trolley things. Isn't
> that what they call those people who go about doing mischief on the
> internet by pushing themselves where not welcome? "Ding, ding goes the
> trolley, did you watch Mr. Rodgers when you were young and his trolley
> bits where the trolley went in endless circles. Don't dispair, the therad
> is young and many will no doubt want to contribute. This diet would be an
> excellent part of the revision to your dietary suggesttions, and it
> addresses some more goals of health and nutrition that your perscriptive
> observations did not reveal. Others have now led you to revise that first
> observation and I can just about hear the gears turning now after you have
> seen the article in this thread.
>
> "No. But I am laughing at you :-)"
>
> Good, we all have a role to play in enriching the lives of those around
> us, laughter is the best medicine, do you know the origin of that phrase?
No, but you remain amusing.
Hope my response enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| wondering@worldnet.com |
"No, but you remain amusing."
Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before us will
not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no one.
Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has flaws. 2.
it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain weight
by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way to
know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health goals
which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods for
the diet.
I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and flunk
in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is only
2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
because you know something about that kind of thing. The other areas are
not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training. That's
where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the 2 lb
diet.
|
|
|
| GaryG |
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
> wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
> >
> > "No, but you remain amusing."
> >
> > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before us
will
> > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no
one.
> >
> > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has flaws.
2.
> > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain weight
> > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way to
> > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health
goals
> > which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
> > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods for
> > the diet.
> >
> > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and
flunk
> > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is
only
> > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
> > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other areas
are
> > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
> > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training. That's
> > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the 2
lb
> > diet.
>
> Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has been
> caught overspeeding on the highway:
>
> Officer: You were going over 55 mph
>
> Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if I
> were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a gun
> pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove only 55
> mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if I
> slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
>
> Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu Reeves?
>
> Speeder: Yes.
>
> Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
>
> Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
>
> Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
>
> Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
>
> Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
>
>
> Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>
> Andrew
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Board-Certified Cardiologist
Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and have
resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?
GG
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
GaryG wrote:
>
> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
> > wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
> > >
> > > "No, but you remain amusing."
> > >
> > > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before us
> will
> > > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no
> one.
> > >
> > > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has flaws.
> 2.
> > > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain weight
> > > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way to
> > > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health
> goals
> > > which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
> > > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods for
> > > the diet.
> > >
> > > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and
> flunk
> > > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is
> only
> > > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
> > > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other areas
> are
> > > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
> > > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training. That's
> > > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the 2
> lb
> > > diet.
> >
> > Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has been
> > caught overspeeding on the highway:
> >
> > Officer: You were going over 55 mph
> >
> > Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if I
> > were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a gun
> > pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove only 55
> > mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if I
> > slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
> >
> > Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu Reeves?
> >
> > Speeder: Yes.
> >
> > Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
> >
> > Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
> >
> > Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
> >
> > Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
> >
> > Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> >
> >
> > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > Board-Certified Cardiologist
>
> Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy.
Sorry the analogy bothers you (shrug).
Hope my response enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| GaryG |
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1103549118.87a199f86c9b2b7c3cdc48b6cb38e107@teranews...
> GaryG wrote:
> >
> > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> > news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
> > > wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "No, but you remain amusing."
> > > >
> > > > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before
us
> > will
> > > > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no
> > one.
> > > >
> > > > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has
flaws.
> > 2.
> > > > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain
weight
> > > > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way
to
> > > > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health
> > goals
> > > > which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
> > > > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods
for
> > > > the diet.
> > > >
> > > > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and
> > flunk
> > > > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is
> > only
> > > > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
> > > > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other
areas
> > are
> > > > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
> > > > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training.
That's
> > > > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the
2
> > lb
> > > > diet.
> > >
> > > Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has been
> > > caught overspeeding on the highway:
> > >
> > > Officer: You were going over 55 mph
> > >
> > > Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if I
> > > were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a gun
> > > pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove only 55
> > > mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if I
> > > slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
> > >
> > > Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu
Reeves?
> > >
> > > Speeder: Yes.
> > >
> > > Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
> > >
> > > Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
> > >
> > > Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
> > >
> > > Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
> > >
> > > Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> > >
> > >
> > > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > > Board-Certified Cardiologist
> >
>> Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
>>
>> I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and
have
>> resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
>> anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
>> adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
>> passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?
>>
>> GG
>
> Sorry the analogy bothers you (shrug).
Sorry, but your analogy (shrug) doesn't bother me (shrug). I was merely
critiquing it's content.
>
> Hope my response enlightens you.
Yes, it does...the way you snip content, avoid the issues raised, and
cross-post when you find yourself frustrated is very enlightening as to your
character.
>
> Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> ( http://makeashorterlink.com/?C11D1211A).
>
>
> Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>
> Andrew
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Board-Certified Cardiologist
>
>
> **
> Who is the humblest person in the universe?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
>
> What is all this about?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
>
> Is this spam?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
GaryG wrote:
>
> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> news:1103549118.87a199f86c9b2b7c3cdc48b6cb38e107@teranews...
> > GaryG wrote:
> > >
> > > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
> > > > wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "No, but you remain amusing."
> > > > >
> > > > > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before
> us
> > > will
> > > > > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no
> > > one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has
> flaws.
> > > 2.
> > > > > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain
> weight
> > > > > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way
> to
> > > > > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health
> > > goals
> > > > > which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
> > > > > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods
> for
> > > > > the diet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and
> > > flunk
> > > > > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is
> > > only
> > > > > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
> > > > > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other
> areas
> > > are
> > > > > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
> > > > > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training.
> That's
> > > > > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the
> 2
> > > lb
> > > > > diet.
> > > >
> > > > Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has been
> > > > caught overspeeding on the highway:
> > > >
> > > > Officer: You were going over 55 mph
> > > >
> > > > Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if I
> > > > were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a gun
> > > > pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove only 55
> > > > mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if I
> > > > slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
> > > >
> > > > Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu
> Reeves?
> > > >
> > > > Speeder: Yes.
> > > >
> > > > Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
> > > >
> > > > Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
> > > >
> > > > Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
> > > >
> > > > Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > > > Board-Certified Cardiologist
> > >
> >> Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
> >>
> >> I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and
> have
> >> resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
> >> anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
> >> adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
> >> passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?
> >>
> >> GG
> >
> > Sorry the analogy bothers you (shrug).
>
> Sorry, but your analogy (shrug) doesn't bother me (shrug). I was merely
> critiquing it's content.
With the word "lame."
> >
> > Hope my response enlightens you.
>
> Yes, it does...the way you snip content, avoid the issues raised, and
> cross-post when you find yourself frustrated is very enlightening as to your
> character.
Sorry my choice to not comment on much of what you or others write
offends you (shrug).
Hope my written response enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| wondering@worldnet.com |
"Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and
have
resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?"
Your demonstrated powers of discernment are very useful. I have become
concerned for Andrew lately. The spirit has seemed to have gone out of
him. Your psych insight leads me to wonder if he has seasonal mood
disorder in addition. The repetive use of stored macro responses is a
symptiom to consider, if one can not but lift a finger then such canned
replies are better then nothing one supposes. I hope we have not hastened
this downward turn by making him mindful of the flaws in his diet in which
he could previously take such pride but knows now he might have to start
as from scratch to make useful for meeting all goals of energetics,
health, and nutrition. But we are here to buck him up and help fill in
the gaps in the diet. So like lancing a boil, he will feel better in the
end and thank us for our concern on his behalf.
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
>
> "Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
>
> I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and
> have
> resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
> anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
> adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
> passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?"
>
> Your demonstrated powers of discernment are very useful. I have become
> concerned for Andrew lately. The spirit has seemed to have gone out of
> him. Your psych insight leads me to wonder if he has seasonal mood
> disorder in addition. The repetive use of stored macro responses is a
> symptiom to consider, if one can not but lift a finger then such canned
> replies are better then nothing one supposes. I hope we have not hastened
> this downward turn by making him mindful of the flaws in his diet in which
> he could previously take such pride but knows now he might have to start
> as from scratch to make useful for meeting all goals of energetics,
> health, and nutrition. But we are here to buck him up and help fill in
> the gaps in the diet. So like lancing a boil, he will feel better in the
> end and thank us for our concern on his behalf.
I sense dispair in what you write. For this you will be in my prayers,
dear neighbor whom I love, in Christ's holy name.
Hope what I write will continue to enlighten you and others.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| wondering@worldnet.com |
"I sense dispair in what you write. For this you will be in my prayers,"
Thank you Andrew, it's good to see you looking a bit better today during
this time of downturn for the worse. However you need be mindful that
those with mood disorders often have distorted images of the feedback
others provide, so you might not want to rely too heavely on "sense" until
things have taken a turn. But do please pray, we all in our times of need
can find great solice in it, would you like me to pray for you also? I
ask because some people use that phrase as though a blunt instrument by
intending a put down and a patronizing take it rather you like it or not
kind of parting shot, but I will assume no such on your part. I will be
happy to pray for you regardless.
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
>
> "I sense dispair in what you write. For this you will be in my prayers,"
>
> Thank you Andrew, it's good to see you looking a bit better today during
> this time of downturn for the worse. However you need be mindful that
> those with mood disorders often have distorted images of the feedback
> others provide, so you might not want to rely too heavely on "sense" until
> things have taken a turn. But do please pray, we all in our times of need
> can find great solice in it, would you like me to pray for you also? I
> ask because some people use that phrase as though a blunt instrument by
> intending a put down and a patronizing take it rather you like it or not
> kind of parting shot, but I will assume no such on your part. I will be
> happy to pray for you regardless.
Thank you for your prayers to God on my behalf. Perhaps there is hope
for you yet.
Hope this enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>
> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message news:1103555448.6287ecbb74872161f8737e7cfea3cbae@teranews...
>
> > GaryG wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
>
> > > news:1103549118.87a199f86c9b2b7c3cdc48b6cb38e107@teranews...
>
> > > > GaryG wrote:
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > > news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
>
> > > > > > wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > "No, but you remain amusing."
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before
>
> > > us
>
> > > > > will
>
> > > > > > > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help
> no
>
> > > > > one.
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has
>
> > > flaws.
>
> > > > > 2.
>
> > > > > > > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain
>
> > > weight
>
> > > > > > > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good
> way
>
> > > to
>
> > > > > > > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health
>
> > > > > goals
>
> > > > > > > which are important when thinking about which foods to include
> 4. it
>
> > > > > > > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods
>
> > > for
>
> > > > > > > the diet.
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only
> and
>
> > > > > flunk
>
> > > > > > > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because
> it is
>
> > > > > only
>
> > > > > > > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix
> it
>
> > > > > > > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other
>
> > > areas
>
> > > > > are
>
> > > > > > > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics
> and
>
> > > > > > > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training.
>
> > > That's
>
> > > > > > > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise
> the
>
> > > 2
>
> > > > > lb
>
> > > > > > > diet.
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has
> been
>
> > > > > > caught overspeeding on the highway:
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Officer: You were going over 55 mph
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if
> I
>
> > > > > > were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a
> gun
>
> > > > > > pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove only
> 55
>
> > > > > > mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if
> I
>
> > > > > > slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu
>
> > > Reeves?
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Speeder: Yes.
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > Andrew
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> > > > > > Board-Certified Cardiologist
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >> Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any better?
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised and
>
> > > have
>
> > > >> resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up with
>
> > > >> anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you are
>
> > > >> adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
>
> > > >> passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before, eh?
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> GG
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Sorry the analogy bothers you (shrug).
>
> > >
>
> > > Sorry, but your analogy (shrug) doesn't bother me (shrug). I was merely
>
> > > critiquing it's content.
>
> >
>
> > With the word "lame."
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Hope my response enlightens you.
>
> > >
>
> > > Yes, it does...the way you snip content, avoid the issues raised, and
>
> > > cross-post when you find yourself frustrated is very enlightening as to
> your
>
> > > character.
>
> >
>
> > Sorry my choice to not comment on much of what you or others write
>
> > offends you (shrug).
>
> >
>
> But you did comment, rather childishly I must add but commented none the less
> (shrug).
It seems you do not read for comprehension.
Hope my observation enlightens you.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
|
|
|
| wondering@worldnet.com |
"Thank you for your prayers to God on my behalf. Perhaps there is hope
for you yet."
Andrew, there is always hope, but we know it is hard to see it just now
considering the downturn. I will pray for you because you ask me. If I
have prompted even a bit of hope in you then all of this is worth the
effort for aiding you in these times.
|
|
|
| GaryG |
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1103555448.6287ecbb74872161f8737e7cfea3cbae@teranews...
> GaryG wrote:
> >
> > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> > news:1103549118.87a199f86c9b2b7c3cdc48b6cb38e107@teranews...
> > > GaryG wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in
message
> > > > news:1103503685.d6727046c262ce0431f6fe984b914a39@teranews...
> > > > > wondering@worldnet.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "No, but you remain amusing."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task
before
> > us
> > > > will
> > > > > > not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will
help no
> > > > one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has
> > flaws.
> > > > 2.
> > > > > > it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a
certain
> > weight
> > > > > > by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good
way
> > to
> > > > > > know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores
health
> > > > goals
> > > > > > which are important when thinking about which foods to include
4. it
> > > > > > ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing
foods
> > for
> > > > > > the diet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only
and
> > > > flunk
> > > > > > in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because
it is
> > > > only
> > > > > > 2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to
fix it
> > > > > > because you know something about that kind of thing. The other
> > areas
> > > > are
> > > > > > not your strong areas because your training in human energetics
and
> > > > > > nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training.
> > That's
> > > > > > where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise
the
> > 2
> > > > lb
> > > > > > diet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your logic continues to remind me of the following driver who has
been
> > > > > caught overspeeding on the highway:
> > > > >
> > > > > Officer: You were going over 55 mph
> > > > >
> > > > > Speeder: I have a lot of problems with going just 55 mph. What if
I
> > > > > were pregnant and about to have a baby? Or what if someone had a
gun
> > > > > pointed at my head and were threatening to shoot me if I drove
only 55
> > > > > mph. Or what if I were Keanu Reeves in that movie Speed where if
I
> > > > > slowed down to 55 mph, the bus would explode?
> > > > >
> > > > > Officer: Are you sure you want me to imagine that you are Keanu
> > Reeves?
> > > > >
> > > > > Speeder: Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Officer: Ok. Here's your ticket Mr. Reeves.
> > > > >
> > > > > Speeder: $2000.00 !!!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Officer: Yes, you should be able to afford that Mr. Reeves ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope the above analogy continues to enlighten you and others.
> > > > >
> > > > > Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > > > > Board-Certified Cardiologist
> > > >
> > >> Hey, Doc...that's an incredibly lame analogy. Can't you do any
better?
> > >>
> > >> I discern that you are unable to answer the questions being raised
and
> > have
> > >> resorted to repeating this silly analogy because you can't come up
with
> > >> anything more cogent. I also notice that in your frustration, you
are
> > >> adding more and more newsgroups to your (cross-)posts. That's very
> > >> passive/agressive behavior, but you've probably heard that before,
eh?
> > >>
> > >> GG
> > >
> > > Sorry the analogy bothers you (shrug).
> >
> > Sorry, but your analogy (shrug) doesn't bother me (shrug). I was merely
> > critiquing it's content.
>
> With the word "lame."
Yes...that's a valid word to use when critiquing the content of a post. Are
you unfamiliar with the word? Here's the definition:
"Weak and ineffectual; unsatisfactory: a lame attempt to apologize; lame
excuses for not arriving on time."
>
> > >
> > > Hope my response enlightens you.
> >
> > Yes, it does...the way you snip content, avoid the issues raised, and
> > cross-post when you find yourself frustrated is very enlightening as to
your
> > character.
>
> Sorry my choice to not comment on much of what you or others write
> offends you (shrug).
Offended? No. Enlightened as to your character? Yes.
>
>
> Hope my written response enlightens you.
>
> Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
> ( http://makeashorterlink.com/?C11D1211A).
>
>
> Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>
> Andrew
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Board-Certified Cardiologist
>
> **
> Who is the humblest person in the universe?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
>
> What is all this about?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
>
> Is this spam?
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?E13D2411A
|
|
|
|
