| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Jeff wrote:
>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
> news:4271B919.71125EAF@heartmdphd.com...
> > RB wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:54:52 -0400, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> >> <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"Ma¢k" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:37:27 +1000, Alan S
> >> >> <loralweightandcarbs@optusnet.com.au> Huffed and Puffed the following
> >> >> into the madness of usenet:
> >> >>
> >> >> >was "I get tired real fast..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:13:33 -0400, Ma¢k
> >> >> ><youknow@yourenutty.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>To paraphrase Lincoln, calling the 2PD-OMER Approach a diet
> >> >> >>>does not make it a diet.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>John
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>so the 2 Pound Diet is not a diet even though it include the
> >> >> >> word DIET in it's name?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>sounds like double speak.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Hi All
> >> >> >
> >> >> >All this discussion on what you call Chung's approach is
> >> >> >irrelevant. I don't care if he calls it Chung's Radical
> >> >> >Approach Programme (CRAP). The only thing that matters is
> >> >> >that it's unadulterated drivel.
> >> >
> >> >That would be your erroneous opinion.
> >> >
> >> >> >I would ignore it if he didn't post on it at least daily
> >> >> >here, and if he didn't greet every newby with it.
> >> >
> >> >That depends on the "newby."
> >> >
> >> >> >I felt it was time to spoil the debate with some facts. How
> >> >> >many in the argument have actually read the CRAP?
> >> >
> >> >You probably mean the 2PD-OMER Approach:
> >> >
> >> >http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
> >> >
> >> >> >I'll help Chung along here a little by providing a link for
> >> >> >him. The CRAP is a *.pdf at
> >> >> >http://www.heartmdphd.com/losewtdm.pdf
> >> >
> >> >That would be the PDF file for the **diabetic** 2PD-OMER Approach.
> >> >
> >> >> >The specifics are simple. Some direct quotes from the
> >> >> >document are:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"Weigh everything you eat and drink for a whole day. The
> >> >> >only things you don't weigh are water and zero-calorie
> >> >> >drinks."
> >> >>
> >> >> he even tells you to weigh in the lettuce you eat.
> >> >
> >> >In truth, there is no mention of specific foods like lettuce in the PDF
> >> >file.
> >> >
> >> >> ask your dietician
> >> >> trained in diabetes care about that waste of time.
> >> >
> >> >A wise dietician would recognize that the salads that people eat should
> >> >not be discounted as non-food.
> >> >
> >> >> There are other
> >> >> food items that we can eat without worrying about that would according
> >> >> to chung be included in that 2 lb diet.
> >> >
> >> >The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet. Indeed, it can and should be
> >> >dovetailed with the ADA **diet** for folks with diabetes.
> >> >
> >> >> ><snip>
> >> >> >"Check your blood sugar every morning before your first meal
> >> >> >of the day to determine how much (if any) diabetic
> >> >> >medications are needed to regulate your blood sugar."
> >> >> ><snip>
> >> >
> >> >What is snipped is important. The parameters that your doctor gives you
> >> >for adjusting diabetic medications as a function of your fasting blood
> >> >glucose should be followed when using the diabetic 2PD-OMER Approach.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >"Gradually, decrease your food intake by a few ounces each
> >> >> >day as tolerated until you consume less than 2 pounds per
> >> >> >day."
> >> >> ><snip>
> >> >
> >> >The 2 pounds of food per day has been empirically determined to be the
> >> >"right" amount (an omer) for everyone. The experiences of more than
> >> >625,550 people for a period of more than 5 years form the basis for this
> >> >empirical determination.
> >>
> >> Andrew, in what Medical Journal has your 2PD-OMER Approach been
> >> published?
> >
> > You will have to wait, sorry.
> >
> > However, it has been presented publicly in front of peers which is the
> > first step toward publication:
>
> I thought the first step was doing a well-designed study.
Already done.
> Then writing a paper.
That would be the second step, which is almost done.
>
> > http://www.heartmdphd.com/press.asp
> >
> >> Where are the published studies that support your position that this
> >> is the correct approach.
> >
> > All the ones that show that eating less brings about weight loss.
>
> These publications don't indicate that your approach is any better than any
> other diet.
However, they do support the "position that this is the correct
approach."
Truth is simple:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?P2264129A
The way to the truth is straight and narrow:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2642108A
You will remain in my prayers, dear Jeff whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.
May you reject your pride and accept Him as your personal Lord and
Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the
fascinating riches of His everlasting kingdom.
Here's how:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD-OMER Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make
His presence known here on Usenet :-)
Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.
Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach, which can "cure" metabolic syndrome (MetS)
thereby bringing this thread back on topic in these NGs :-)
http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
At His service,
Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D5217EA
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U2A821CEA
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
|
|
|
|
