| *** Rob Wade *** |
Gays are not gays!
Cynthia A. Janak
Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
lesson in the definition of these two terms. I am going to use a
dictionary that was published in the 1942. I don't care what the terms
mean today. I am looking at the historical value behind the terms.
This is taken from the "Webster's 20th Century Dictionary of the
English Language":
Gay - ga y, a. [ME. gay; Ofr. gai, O.H.G. gahi, quick, sudden, rash,
lively.]
1=2E - Merry, airy, jovial, sportive, frolicsome. It denotes more live
and animation that cheerful.
Belinda smiled and all the world was gay. - Alexander Pope.
2=2E - Fine, showy; as, a gay dress.
3=2E - Inflamed or merry with liquor, intoxicated, dissipated. [Colloq.]
Syn. - Merry, lively, blithe, sprightly, sportive, hilarious.
Ho "mo -sex'u -=E4 l - a. [Homo-, and L. sexualis, from sexus, sex] Of
or pertaining to homosexuals or homosexuality, characterized by sexual
inclination toward the same sex.
Ho "mo -sex'u -=E4 l - n. In psychology and psychiatry, one whose
emotions, feelings and desires are concerned with the individual's own
sex rather than with the opposite sex.
Ho "mo -sex'u -=E4 l' =EE -ty - n. In psychology and psychiatry, sexual
feeling for or interest in an individual of one's own sex: sexual
perversion; also, as a step in psychosexual development, the normal
interest in and concern for a member of one's own sex seen in normal
friendship, if carried beyond this stage, it becomes pathological and
perverted, depending on its substitution for heterosexual love and its
manner of sexual expression.
In this dictionary there were no other definitions for gay. I printed
exactly what was in the Webster's 1942 edition. If you do not like the
definitions then too bad. Deal with it. I write only with truth and
fact, historical and present. I will not shade or twist what the truth
is.
Now as to why I am writing about this topic when there is so much other
more important news happening in the world today.
This morning when I turned on my computer I was greeted with a story
about Kraft Foods. It was sent to my email by the "American Family
Association." I receive various emails from different organizations so
that I can keep up with the topics that I feel are important to the
American public. This was the last straw. I hate hearing about this
stuff before I get to drink my first cup of caffeine.
I am sick and tired of all of the homosexuals who because they are
ashamed of who they truly are, have to term themselves as gay. They are
not gay (please reference the definition above.) They use the term gay
to make what they are more acceptable to them and no one else. If they
were truly proud of who they are then they would use the proper English
language term homosexual. But they do not and that just shows me that
they are ashamed of their sexual orientation.
They have smeared the words gay and rainbow. I will not use the word
gay to reflect how I feel. (Reference the term above.) I am a happy and
jovial person and I should not be ashamed of using the word gay to
reflect my feelings as is proper within the framework of the English
language. There are many people that I know who find it offensive that
they call themselves gay. I have homosexual friends and they are proud
of it. I respect them for who they are as people. And (here is the big
and) they do not shove the fact that they are homosexuals in my face
every single day.
Would they like us heterosexuals to shove our sexuality in their faces
by having rallies and other events just like they do. I would think
not. They would have the ACLU on our backs telling us that we were
discriminating against them. They would term it hate speech or
something like that. On the other hand maybe we should. They would see
that the orientation of the majority of Americans is heterosexual.
Now I want to reference a sentence taken from the chicagoist, dated
05/12/2005. "Have you noticed that those right-wing groups like to use
the word "homosexual" more than most?" Let me tell you why we do that,
bucko. We use the term homosexual because it is the proper term to use.
We are using correct English. Because you do not like that does not
mean that you can call them right-wing. We are just average American
citizens that believe in traditional moral and family values. There are
many in America that are left-wing and have traditional moral and
family values. This is not just a right-wing group thing.
Kevin Boyer, co-vice chairman of the board and the chairman of the
marketing committee for the Gay Games had this to say. "Obviously, we
are disappointed that Kraft has been targeted by extremists..."
EXTREMISTS he says. I am sorry but I do not think that having family
and moral values extreme. I think AIDS is extreme, PEDOPHILIA is
extreme but having family values...not. 'Gays' are the extremists. They
are the ones that are constantly screaming their homosexuality to the
masses.
Here is another quote by Boyer. "It's disappointing that a group would
target something like an event that celebrates sports and healthy
lifestyles." I have a question. What is so healthy about AIDS and the
other health issues that face the homosexual community? I do not find
this to be a healthy lifestyle at all.
Did you know that homosexuals are not banned from any athletic event
because of sexuality? They are not so why do they feel the need to have
such an event? They can participate in any triathlon or sporting event
without fear of reprisal. When my daughter was younger she used to
participate in these events. Everyone looked the same to me.
Also, do you know that homosexuals are not discriminated against in
regards to marriage? Don't be so shocked. It is true. Any homosexual
man can marry any homosexual or heterosexual woman and any homosexual
woman can marry any homosexual or heterosexual man. It is true. So they
are not discriminated against in regards to marriage.
But, they would have you to believe that they are being discriminated
against and denied their rights to marriage. That is just not true and
they know it. They are just a bunch of malcontents that want their own
way or they will throw a tantrum. Waaaahhh!!!
In an article that I wrote a while back I referenced a study that was
done about the homosexual behaviors. I would like to reference that
study here.
"There are studies that disclose homosexual men are more likely to
abuse children then heterosexual men. This is because, per capita, more
homosexual males were abused in some way when they were young. Most
often it was sexual abuse by a trusted male. If the abuse was repeated
over a period of time the action becomes normal and the adult
homosexual male does not even realize that it is wrong. I read this in
an article by NARTH - National Association for Research and Therapy
of Homosexuality."
A 2001 study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior utilizes a non-clinical
sample of 942 adults to compare rates of childhood molestation between
heterosexuals and non-heterosexuals.
The authors found that 46% of homosexuals and 22% of lesbian women
reported homosexual molestation in childhood. This compared to
childhood homosexual molestation rates of only 7% of heterosexual men
and 1% of heterosexual women.
The authors review substantial previous research which also found a
link between homosexuality and a history of childhood sexual abuse.
Their own research is apparently the first survey, the authors say,
"that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls." The
female victims had a mean age of 13 at the time of the same-sex abuse,
while the comparable group of abused boys had a mean age of 11.
Joyanna Silberg, Ph.D., co-author of the Rind study critique, said
Rind's conclusion that most men did not suffer negative effects from
childhood sexual abuse is in fact not supported by Rind's own data.
Silberg, a child psychologist from Baltimore, Md., said Rind "failed to
note that the men's subjective perceptions did not correlate with their
results on objective measure." For example, compared to their
non-abused peers, more than twice as many abused men said they had used
illegal drugs, three times as many had sought therapy for emotional
problems and five times as many said they had attempted suicide.
Also, in regards to the gays, and I use that term begrudgingly, they
are not discriminated in the workplace either. As a person with human
resource experience, a homosexual person can have any job that they are
qualified for. Companies I know do not care what your preference is.
They just do not want it exhibited in the work place. That is why we
have employment laws in regards to employee rights. In most company
handbooks you will find a chapter in regards to the company's policy on
harassment. Most companies sponsor training seminars for their
supervisors, managers and employees in the prevention of workplace
harassment. Just do the job you are hired to do just like the
heterosexuals is all they want.
Most companies have a policy as to what they consider to be the proper
attire for their establishment. This is usually a chapter in the
employee handbook. These are standards set in place as to what the
employer believes the image they want their employees to portray to
their customers. Here is an example of what could be unacceptable
attire. A man with a beard wearing a dress because he is a cross
dresser working as a cashier. I'm sorry but Klinger from MASH may have
looked cute but that is fantasy. I know I would not want to look at
those hairy legs. Augh!!!!!!
To get back to the original topic of homosexuals calling themselves
gay. They are not (reference definition above) and everything they do
and everything they say just proves to the American public that they
are nothing more than a bunch of malcontents that are not sure of their
own sexuality. If they were secure with their own sexuality then they
would not feel the need to be exhibitionists about it. They may have
latent feelings that something is just not right and that the
possibilities that they were abused in some fashion when they were
children could be of major importance.
Homosexuals need to reflect into their own sexuality and past to see if
there is an underlying psychological cause as to their sexual
orientation. There probably is as the studies show. But, and here is
another big but, they are afraid to do so because they might find out
the truth. People with radical ideas like the left-wing extremist
homosexuals (boy, that sounded good) want attention. I surmise that it
may be because of a lack of attention as a child or the wrong kind of
attention during the formative years.
|
|
|
| Barrnabas Collins |
On 17 Nov 2005 14:55:33 -0800, "*** Rob Wade ***"
<rob_c_wade_3@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
>not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
>lesson in the definition of these two terms. I am going to use a
>dictionary that was published in the 1942. I don't care what the terms
>mean today. I am looking at the historical value behind the terms.
Here is a news flash for you: english is a living, ever changing,
vibrant language. You show me a language that doesn't change
over the years and i'll show you a dead language.
In 1942 they would have never heard of the internet, a blog,
a cell phone, etc.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
|
|
| Midjis |
I am usually a stickler for grammar, spelling and punctuation, but I
like to think I take a reasonably objective view of things when it comes
to usage. In terms of word usage, I admit I usually find myself arguing
for the older rather than the newer - but there are occasions when there
simply is no reason not to accept a newer meaning, spelling or use of a
word.
The extremely well-worn argument that crops up from time to time over
the use of the word 'gay' is one such example.
(By the way, I'm not sure who or what 'Cynthia A. Janak' is - it may be
that the inclusion of her name by Rob Wade implies her authorship of
this post. Be that as it may, since Mr Wade has not offered any
challenge or disagreement I will take it that his views are the same.)
"*** Rob Wade ***" <rob_c_wade_3@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
> not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
> lesson in the definition of these two terms. I am going to use a
> dictionary that was published in the 1942. I don't care what the terms
> mean today. I am looking at the historical value behind the terms.
No - what you're doing is taking a dictionary sixty-three years old and
insisting, *despite* conventional usage, that an older, fading meaning
be adhered to exclusively.
This post is nothing to do with the historical 'value' of the term.
Words do change their meaning over time, and it is not possible to
prescribe a specific meaning and enforce it against convention.
> In this dictionary there were no other definitions for gay.
This is to be expected. As you have discovered, in 1942 'gay' did
indeed mean happy and bright. However, in times past, 'nice' meant
'neat and tidy'. Now it means 'pleasant'. In times past, 'prove' meant
'test'. Now it means 'establish as true'.
I do not see you insisting on the reintroduction of the older meaning of
these words. Is it possible that it is your dislike of gay people
themselves, and not your concern for the preservation of the language,
is the source of your irritation?
> exactly what was in the Webster's 1942 edition. If you do not like the
> definitions then too bad. Deal with it.
It appears to be you who is having trouble 'dealing with it'. It is not
a case of whether one LIKES a definition or not. It is a fact of
historical linguistics that the meaning of the word 'gay' has changed.
No-one is challenging that fact. No-one is arguing that the definition
you provided from your 1942 dictionary is not correct. You are
defending yourself against a non-existent opponent here.
> Now as to why I am writing about this topic when there is so much
> other more important news happening in the world today.
Indeed there are - but this is a free forum and you may discuss (more or
less) what you wish, if you feel strongly enough about it.
> This morning when I turned on my computer I was greeted with a story
> about Kraft Foods. It was sent to my email by the "American Family
> Association." I receive various emails from different organizations so
> that I can keep up with the topics that I feel are important to the
> American public. This was the last straw. I hate hearing about this
> stuff before I get to drink my first cup of caffeine.
It might be an idea to drink your caffeine BEFORE checking your emails
in future, then. Of course, this is only a suggestion.
> I am sick and tired of all of the homosexuals who because they are
> ashamed of who they truly are, have to term themselves as gay. They
> are not gay (please reference the definition above.)
Why should we reference a definition which is anything up to sixty-three
years out of date?
> They use the term gay
> to make what they are more acceptable to them and no one else. If they
> were truly proud of who they are then they would use the proper
> English language term homosexual.
Again, your argument falls down in that, in a 2005 dictionary, 'gay' IS
a correct English language term. Since you have cited Webster's as your
preferred source, you may wish to examine this URL:
http://www.websters-online-dictiona.../definition/gay
It gives a more up-to-date definition of the word.
Remember, a dictionary does not shape language. Language shapes a
dictionary.
> They have smeared the words gay and rainbow. I will not use the word
> gay to reflect how I feel.
As well you might not. Few others would use the word in this sense now.
> I am a happy and jovial person and I should not be ashamed of using
> the word gay to reflect my feelings as is proper within the framework
> of the English language.
You have just described yourself perfectly adequately with the words
'happy' and 'jovial'. Based on your argument here - both in the way you
make it and the fact that you make it - you do not strike me as either.
However, that is by the way.
The fact remains that there are a multitude of synonyms available to
describe a happy and jovial person. One of those synonyms has shifted
meaning. The English language is no worse off for it.
> There are many people that I know who find it offensive that
> they call themselves gay.
If THEY find it offensive that they call THEMSELVES gay then perhaps
they should consider calling themselves something else?
> Would they like us heterosexuals to shove our sexuality in their faces
> by having rallies and other events just like they do. I would think
> not.
Probably not, and I agree that there is an intrinsic discrimination in
permitting sexuality-based 'pride' parades for one orientation but not
for others. If such a parade by heterosexuals would be considered
discrimination against homosexuals, then it is a given that such a march
by homosexuals must also be considered discriminatory and exclusive.
However, this is irrelevant to the matter of the meaning of the word
'gay'.
> They would have the ACLU on our backs telling us that we were
> discriminating against them. They would term it hate speech or
> something like that. On the other hand maybe we should. They would see
> that the orientation of the majority of Americans is heterosexual.
Nobody questions for one moment that the majority of Americans *are*
heterosexual. Not even homosexuals are in any doubt about that. Do you
really feel so deeply threatened by homosexuals?
> Now I want to reference a sentence taken from the chicagoist, dated
> 05/12/2005. "Have you noticed that those right-wing groups like to use
> the word "homosexual" more than most?" Let me tell you why we do that,
> bucko. We use the term homosexual because it is the proper term to
> use. We are using correct English.
Ah? Correct English like 'bucko', you mean? Not averse to the odd
colloquialism, then, the 'Chicagoist'. So it must pick and choose its
principles to make its political points, it seems.
> We are just average American
> citizens that believe in traditional moral and family values.
Right... You see, the problem is not that you believe in 'traditional
moral and family values'. It's that you believe that YOUR values should
be imposed on everyone.
In other words, you're narrow-minded.
You - as a free American - are quite entitled to be heterosexual, to
marry, to have two-point-whatever nuclear kids, educate them in whatever
beliefs you have, maybe send them to Sunday school, or whatever you
believe consitutes a 'family value'. You're even free to disown those
kids and damn them to Hell if at some point they tell you they're gay
(although it's highly doubtful they'd dare, I should imagine).
But you - as a free American - are not entitled to make those decisions
for other people. And let's face it: that's what really rankles, isn't
it?
> Kevin Boyer, co-vice chairman of the board and the chairman of the
> marketing committee for the Gay Games had this to say. "Obviously, we
> are disappointed that Kraft has been targeted by extremists..."
> EXTREMISTS he says. I am sorry but I do not think that having family
> and moral values extreme. I think AIDS is extreme, PEDOPHILIA is
> extreme but having family values...not. 'Gays' are the extremists.
> They are the ones that are constantly screaming their homosexuality to
> the masses.
Homosexuals in general are rather vociferous about their preferences, it
must be said. At least, those who are vociferous are vociferous. Those
who are not, of course, we do not notice.
However, in that they are very similar to, say, Christians, or those who
stand for 'moral and family values' - who in many cases also feel the
need to shout the odds about what they think is right, and what they
should be allowed to do, and how other people should act.
Quite why someone's sexuality should be something they need to bellow
from the rooftops is beyond me. But nor is it something they should
have to hide. It is a balance, I suppose, as are all things. But I
would have much the same view about a person's religion.
Your less-than-subtle attempt to equate homosexuality and paedophilia is
unsurprising, and, like many before you who have tried for the same
tactic, you have missed the point. Paedophilia is a crime, and rightly
so, because it is exploitative. Consensual sex between adults,
homosexual or otherwise, is not. Therefore, the one is a crime while
the other is legal.
What your personal religion might lead you to think about the matter
need concern only you.
> They are just a bunch of malcontents that want their own
> way or they will throw a tantrum. Waaaahhh!!!
Puts me in mind of the sort of person who'd write a whiny article
protesting a word usage that's been established for several decades...
> Also, in regards to the gays, and I use that term begrudgingly, they
> are not discriminated in the workplace either. As a person with human
> resource experience, a homosexual person can have any job that they
> are qualified for. Companies I know do not care what your preference
> is. They just do not want it exhibited in the work place.
And fair enough. Gay or straight, your employer pays you to work, not
to have sex.
Unless you're in a 'specialist' industry, of course.
> To get back to the original topic of homosexuals calling themselves
> gay.
Oh, you hadn't forgotten it entirely, then...
> They are not (reference definition above)
Again, the reference that's sixty-three years old. Feel free, as I
said, to reference the current definition from the same source. You
will find that, according to modern, established usage, they are indeed
gay.
> Homosexuals need to reflect into their own sexuality and past to see
> if there is an underlying psychological cause as to their sexual
> orientation.
No they don't. They might like to. They might wish to. But they don't
NEED to. That's just the insistence of someone like you, who just can't
tolerate the existence of someone you can't understand.
> I surmise that it
> may be because of a lack of attention as a child or the wrong kind of
> attention during the formative years.
And you may be right. Alternatively, you may be simply parroting
whole-cloth pop psycho-twaddle in the hope that people will accept it
unquestioningly because it sounds good.
No doubt there are homosexuals who do fit your generalisation - but
generalisation it still is.
|
|
|
| Dionisio |
*** Rob Wade *** wrote:
>This is taken from the "Webster's 20th Century Dictionary of the
>English Language":
>
>1. - Merry, airy, jovial, sportive, frolicsome. It denotes more live
>and animation that cheerful.
>
>Belinda smiled and all the world was gay. - Alexander Pope.
>
>2. - Fine, showy; as, a gay dress.
>
>3. - Inflamed or merry with liquor, intoxicated, dissipated. [Colloq.]
>
>
<Mode.Camp=On>
So, we're merry, frolicsome, animated, love to wear showy dresses, and
also like alcohol, but we're not the epitome of "gay"? Puh-lease...
<mode.Camp=Off>
<Cue "I'm a Lumberjack" song>
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
|
|
|
| michael james |
Midjis wrote:
> I am usually a stickler for grammar, spelling and punctuation, but I
> like to think I take a reasonably objective view of things when it comes
> to usage. In terms of word usage, I admit I usually find myself arguing
> for the older rather than the newer - but there are occasions when there
> simply is no reason not to accept a newer meaning, spelling or use of a
> word.
>
> The extremely well-worn argument that crops up from time to time over
> the use of the word 'gay' is one such example.
>
> (By the way, I'm not sure who or what 'Cynthia A. Janak' is - it may be
> that the inclusion of her name by Rob Wade implies her authorship of
> this post. Be that as it may, since Mr Wade has not offered any
> challenge or disagreement I will take it that his views are the same.)
>
snip
e formative years.
>
>
> And you may be right. Alternatively, you may be simply parroting
> whole-cloth pop psycho-twaddle in the hope that people will accept it
> unquestioningly because it sounds good.
>
> No doubt there are homosexuals who do fit your generalisation - but
> generalisation it still is.
And then one night many years ago, I was watching Laugh-In and some one
sang a song "you don't have to be happy to be gay"
|
|
|
| Bill Baker |
*** Rob Wade *** wrote:
> Gays are not gays!
>
>
> Cynthia A. Janak
>
>From http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
<<Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
lesson in the definition of these two terms.>>
"Oh Jesus!" you say. "She's not going to prove her point by quoting the
goddamn dictionary, is she?"
Well, yes she is. But there's a twist- apparently, Cynthia will only
quote dictionaries published before the end of World War II:
<<I am going to use a dictionary that was published in the 1942. I
don't care what the terms mean today. I am looking at the historical
value behind the terms.>>
Yes, after World War II, dictionaries were taken over by
sodomy-enabling secularists who tried to make America accept
homosexuality by hijacking some of our most cherished words, including
"gay," "flamer," and "all-night anal sex party."
And say, while we're appreciating the "historical value" of words,
let's recall the definition of "oats" as written by Samuel Johnson in
his 1755 dictionary: "a grain, which in England is generally given to
horses, but in Scotland supports the people."
So you can see how the modern secularist dictionary has ruined what
used to be a great insult against those filthy Scotish people. Is
nothing sacred?
<<This is taken from the "Webster's 20th Century Dictionary of the
English Language":
Gay - ga y, a. [ME. gay; Ofr. gai, O.H.G. gahi, quick, sudden, rash,
lively.]
1. - Merry, airy, jovial, sportive, frolicsome. It denotes more live
and animation that cheerful.
Belinda smiled and all the world was gay. - Alexander Pope.
2. - Fine, showy; as, a gay dress.
3. - Inflamed or merry with liquor, intoxicated, dissipated.
[Colloq.]>>
And if you combine these definitions, you get "Frolicking flamer
wearing a dress." Where's the controversy?
<<In this dictionary there were no other definitions for gay.>>
"There was also no definition for 'CD player,' proving that phonographs
are the only legitimate way to listen to music."
<<I printed exactly what was in the Webster's 1942 edition. If you do
not like the definitions then too bad. Deal with it. I write only with
truth and fact, historical and present.>>
Uhm, since you didn't quote today's official definition of "gay," I
find that hard to believe...
<<Now as to why I am writing about this topic when there is so much
other more important news happening in the world today.>>
Because you're obsessed with gay people?
<<This morning when I turned on my computer I was greeted with a story
about Kraft Foods. It was sent to my email by the "American Family
Association." I receive various emails from different organizations so
that I can keep up with the topics that I feel are important to the
American public. This was the last straw. I hate hearing about this
stuff before I get to drink my first cup of caffeine.>>
Well, if you're tired of hearing about gay people, I'd reccommend
cancelling that subscription to the American Family Association's
morning headlines, since roughly one-fourth of them are about "the
homosexual agenda."
Read the rest at http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
|
|
|
| Ward Abbott |
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 01:19:04 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
<paitken@CRAPnc.rr.com> wrote:
>Is the stupid olympics in town? The retard convention? The bigot
>competition? The knuckle-dragging race? The nitwit Oscars? Must be one of
>these, such gems of stupidity do not come up everyday.
Peter....YES, it does happen every day in rec.food.cooking. WE have
win money with Paypal.....I burned my whatever...how do I stop dingy
film from the bottom of my pan...come chat tonight. The list is
beyond the pale.
We have obnoxious posters that ridicule anyone who doesn't agree with
them....posters that POST THE SAME TIRED RECIPES over and over. Most
were never good to start with and re posting them doesn't make them
better.
Good bye and good luck.
|
|
|
| Stark |
In article <1132268133.167020.193520@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, ***
Rob Wade *** <rob_c_wade_3@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Gays are not gays!
>
>
> Cynthia A. Janak
>
Can we use fine and/or dandy?
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:1132311378.515166.312570@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> *** Rob Wade *** wrote:
> > Gays are not gays!
> >
> >
> > Cynthia A. Janak
> >
>
> >From http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
>
> <<Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
> not > Well, if you're tired of hearing about gay people, I'd reccommend
> cancelling that subscription to the American Family Association's
> morning headlines, since roughly one-fourth of them are about "the
> homosexual agenda."
A bit obsessed don't you think? THAT makes one pause and wonder.
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Bill Baker wrote:
> *** Rob Wade *** wrote:
>
>>Gays are not gays!
>>
>>
>>Cynthia A. Janak
>
>>From http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
>
> <<Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
> not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
> lesson in the definition of these two terms.>>
>
>
> "Oh Jesus!" you say. "She's not going to prove her point by quoting the
> goddamn dictionary, is she?"
In the spirit of the season:
"Don we now our gay apparel,
Fa la la,
La la la,
La la la"
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
news:tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga...
> Bill Baker wrote:
>
> > *** Rob Wade *** wrote:
> >
> >>Gays are not gays!
> >>
> >>
> >>Cynthia A. Janak
> >
> >>From http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
> >
> > <<Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
> > not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
> > lesson in the definition of these two terms.>>
> >
> >
> > "Oh Jesus!" you say. "She's not going to prove her point by quoting the
> > goddamn dictionary, is she?"
>
> In the spirit of the season:
>
> "Don we now our gay apparel,
> Fa la la,
> La la la,
> La la la"
OR, "Don we now our straight apparel,
La fa fa
fa fa fa
fa fa fa." :)
Geez... THIS is truly a subject beat to death, and here comes YET one more
who is going to take issue with the word, "gay."
|
|
|
| Bill Baker |
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:34:30 -0500, Sparky Spartacus
<Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
news:<tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>...
> Bill Baker wrote:
>
>> *** Rob Wade *** wrote:
>>
>>>Gays are not gays!
>>>
>>>
>>>Cynthia A. Janak
>>
>>>From http://sadlyno.com/archives/001435.html
>>
>> <<Okay people I have had it with all this gay bashing. These people are
>> not gay they are homosexuals, plain and simple. Let me give everyone a
>> lesson in the definition of these two terms.>>
>>
>>
>> "Oh Jesus!" you say. "She's not going to prove her point by quoting the
>> goddamn dictionary, is she?"
>
> In the spirit of the season:
>
> "Don we now our gay apparel,
> Fa la la,
> La la la,
> La la la"
She should look in the 1942 dictionary for the definition of "National
Socialism".
"a strong and vital movement which has revitalised German society and made
it one of the key players in modern society."
--
Funny Lurlean quote #47:
But the floodgates are open, and the TIDE is rolling in and drowning the whole
country in bean dip. --Lurlean warns about the evils of nachos.
|
|
|
| Buck Turgidson |
In article <tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>,
Sparky Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote:
>
> In the spirit of the season:
>
> "Don we now our gay apparel,
> Fa la la,
> La la la,
> La la la"
"No no no! Not 'fa ra ra'! Fa la la!"
"Jingre berrs, jingre berrs..."
--
Yeah the revolution starts now
In your own backyard
In your own hometown
So what you doin' standin' around?
Just follow your heart
The revolution starts now
--Steve Earle
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Buck Turgidson wrote:
> In article <tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>,
> Sparky Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote:
>
>
>>In the spirit of the season:
>>
>>"Don we now our gay apparel,
>>Fa la la,
>>La la la,
>>La la la"
>
>
> "No no no! Not 'fa ra ra'! Fa la la!"
>
> "Jingre berrs, jingre berrs..."
"Ling my berr?"
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
news:Ut6hf.79502$rE2.22274@fe10.lga...
> Buck Turgidson wrote:
> > In article <tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>,
> > Sparky Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In the spirit of the season:
> >>
> >>"Don we now our gay apparel,
> >>Fa la la,
> >>La la la,
> >>La la la"
> >
> >
> > "No no no! Not 'fa ra ra'! Fa la la!"
> >
> > "Jingre berrs, jingre berrs..."
>
> "Ling my berr?"
Don we now our gay apparel?
Lesbian in their shirts of flannel?
Gay men in their skirts of camel?
Rah ha ha ha Fa la la la!
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Jude Alexander wrote:
> "Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
> news:Ut6hf.79502$rE2.22274@fe10.lga...
>
>>Buck Turgidson wrote:
>>
>>>In article <tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>,
>>> Sparky Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In the spirit of the season:
>>>>
>>>>"Don we now our gay apparel,
>>>>Fa la la,
>>>>La la la,
>>>>La la la"
>>>
>>>
>>>"No no no! Not 'fa ra ra'! Fa la la!"
>>>
>>>"Jingre berrs, jingre berrs..."
>>
>>"Ling my berr?"
>
>
> Don we now our gay apparel?
> Lesbian in their shirts of flannel?
> Gay men in their skirts of camel?
"skirts of camel"?
> Rah ha ha ha Fa la la la!
And don't you forget it!
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
news:gdyhf.7045$mM2.1170@fe09.lga...
> Jude Alexander wrote:
>
> > "Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
> > news:Ut6hf.79502$rE2.22274@fe10.lga...
> >
> >>Buck Turgidson wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <tGmgf.15128$ha2.6864@fe08.lga>,
> >>> Sparky Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In the spirit of the season:
> >>>>
> >>>>"Don we now our gay apparel,
> >>>>Fa la la,
> >>>>La la la,
> >>>>La la la"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"No no no! Not 'fa ra ra'! Fa la la!"
> >>>
> >>>"Jingre berrs, jingre berrs..."
> >>
> >>"Ling my berr?"
> >
> >
> > Don we now our gay apparel?
> > Lesbian in their shirts of flannel?
> > Gay men in their skirts of camel?
>
> "skirts of camel"?
>
> > Rah ha ha ha Fa la la la!
>
> And don't you forget it!
Was that a stretch? lol There ARE camel coats, now! lol I HAD to rhyme
and there is nothing exactly rhyming well with apparel or flannel.. I
thought of "sable" but it seemed to me camel was closer. :)
|
|
|
| Cleopatra |
X-No-archive: yes
Sparky Spartacus wrote:
> In the spirit of the season:
>
> "Don we now our gay apparel,
> Fa la la,
> La la la,
> La la la"
Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
Up my ass with AIDS injections
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
'Tis the season for infections
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Don we now our gay diseases
Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Cleopatra
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Cleopatra wrote:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>
>
>>In the spirit of the season:
>>
>>"Don we now our gay apparel,
>>Fa la la,
>>La la la,
>>La la la"
>
>
> Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
>
> Up my ass with AIDS injections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> 'Tis the season for infections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Don we now our gay diseases
> Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
> Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Cleopatra
The lear Creopatla would nevel have posted this!
|
|
|
| jt |
Sparky Spartacus wrote:
> Cleopatra wrote:
>
>> X-No-archive: yes
>>
>> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In the spirit of the season:
>>>
>>> "Don we now our gay apparel,
>>> Fa la la,
>>> La la la,
>>> La la la"
>>
>>
>> Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
>>
>> Up my ass with AIDS injections
>> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> 'Tis the season for infections
>> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>
>> Don we now our gay diseases
>> Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
>> Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
>> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>
>> Cleopatra
>
> The lear Creopatla would nevel have posted this!
Could you try that again?
--
jt
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Cleopatra" <Let_Em_Eat_Indictments@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1133116380.123941.48160@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>
> > In the spirit of the season:
> >
> > "Don we now our gay apparel,
> > Fa la la,
> > La la la,
> > La la la"
>
> Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
>
> Up my ass with AIDS injections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> 'Tis the season for infections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Don we now our gay diseases
> Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
> Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Cleopatra
Deck the Land with religiosity
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
'Tis the season for bigotry
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Don we now our own death lazers
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Troll the ancient hateful phrases
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
See the blazing fire before us
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
Kill the gays and join the chorus
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Follow me in hateful measure
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
While preaching religious treasure
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Fast away the burning pile passes.
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
Sing we joyous, all together.
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
heedless of our dead and buried.
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:50:04 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>Deck the Land with religiosity
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>'Tis the season for bigotry
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Don we now our own death lazers
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Troll the ancient hateful phrases
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
>See the blazing fire before us
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
>Kill the gays and join the chorus
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Follow me in hateful measure
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>While preaching religious treasure
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Fast away the burning pile passes.
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>Sing we joyous, all together.
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>heedless of our dead and buried.
>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
You should copyright that, because it could become a breakaway pop
hit!
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:5pfmo1dvm8ohfkc90aobhlejtda2s16465@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:50:04 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>
>
> >Deck the Land with religiosity
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >'Tis the season for bigotry
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Don we now our own death lazers
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >
> >See the blazing fire before us
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Follow me in hateful measure
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >While preaching religious treasure
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >Sing we joyous, all together.
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >heedless of our dead and buried.
> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> You should copyright that, because it could become a breakaway pop
> hit!
>
>
> May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
>
> Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
Did I do good, Rev.? lol
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:24:54 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>
>"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
>news:5pfmo1dvm8ohfkc90aobhlejtda2s16465@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:50:04 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
>> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
>> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
>> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>>
>>
>> >Deck the Land with religiosity
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >'Tis the season for bigotry
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Don we now our own death lazers
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >
>> >See the blazing fire before us
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
>> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Follow me in hateful measure
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >While preaching religious treasure
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >Sing we joyous, all together.
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >heedless of our dead and buried.
>> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>
>> You should copyright that, because it could become a breakaway pop
>> hit!
>>
>>
>> May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
>>
>> Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
>
>Did I do good, Rev.? lol
I feel that your work above was divinely inspired, my child.
Keep up the good work.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
|
|
|
| Jude Alexander |
"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:21kmo1hst5kdbkskoet267pc89mb2ccv1s@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:24:54 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>
> >
> >"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
> >news:5pfmo1dvm8ohfkc90aobhlejtda2s16465@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:50:04 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> >> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> >> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
> >> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
> >>
> >>
> >> >Deck the Land with religiosity
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >'Tis the season for bigotry
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Don we now our own death lazers
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >
> >> >See the blazing fire before us
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
> >> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Follow me in hateful measure
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >While preaching religious treasure
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >Sing we joyous, all together.
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >heedless of our dead and buried.
> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >>
> >> You should copyright that, because it could become a breakaway pop
> >> hit!
> >>
> >>
> >> May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
> >>
> >> Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
> >
> >Did I do good, Rev.? lol
>
> I feel that your work above was divinely inspired, my child.
> Keep up the good work.
Thank you, oh most Reverent One. I shall do my best to make you proud!
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:31:06 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>
>"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
>news:21kmo1hst5kdbkskoet267pc89mb2ccv1s@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:24:54 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
>> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
>> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
>> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>>
>> >
>> >"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
>> >news:5pfmo1dvm8ohfkc90aobhlejtda2s16465@4ax.com...
>> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:50:04 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
>> >> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
>> >> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Jude
>> >> Alexander" <JAT@southLA.usa>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Deck the Land with religiosity
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >'Tis the season for bigotry
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Don we now our own death lazers
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >
>> >> >See the blazing fire before us
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
>> >> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Follow me in hateful measure
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >While preaching religious treasure
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >Sing we joyous, all together.
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >heedless of our dead and buried.
>> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >>
>> >> You should copyright that, because it could become a breakaway pop
>> >> hit!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
>> >>
>> >> Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
>> >
>> >Did I do good, Rev.? lol
>>
>> I feel that your work above was divinely inspired, my child.
>> Keep up the good work.
>
>Thank you, oh most Reverent One. I shall do my best to make you proud!
Don't worry about me, honey.
DO IT FOR GONG GONG!!!!
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
|
|
|
| Cleopatra |
X-No-archive: yes
Hey, ya dumb ****! When you get a sense for meter try this again. What
a ******* lame.
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> >> >> >Deck the Land with religiosity
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >'Tis the season for bigotry
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Don we now our own death lazers
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >
> >> >> >See the blazing fire before us
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
> >> >> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Follow me in hateful measure
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >While preaching religious treasure
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >Sing we joyous, all together.
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> >> >> >heedless of our dead and buried.
> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
>
> Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On 28 Nov 2005 13:28:52 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Let_Em_Eat_Indictments@hotmail.com>
>X-No-archive: yes
>
>Hey, ya dumb ****!
Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
How's the weather in Winnetka?
Oh, and I did not write what you attributed to me. Hell, I didn't even
post it.
That kinda makes you the dumb ****, Marie/Rene/Diane Harper/Hillary/
Laura, Darrow, Foster, and/or Earl
Harper/Lani-girl/{Phoenix/Evan/Jason/Melvin/Nancy/Barbara
Walker/Darlene/Donna/Debby/coolgirl/whoever/etc.
>JUDE ALEXANDER WROTE:
>> >> >> >Deck the Land with religiosity
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >'Tis the season for bigotry
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Don we now our own death lazers
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Troll the ancient hateful phrases
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >See the blazing fire before us
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-l
>> >> >> >Kill the gays and join the chorus
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Follow me in hateful measure
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >While preaching religious treasure
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Fast away the burning pile passes.
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Hail the new year minus all the ashes.
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >Sing we joyous, all together.
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>> >> >> >heedless of our dead and buried.
>> >> >> >Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Sheldon |
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> <Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
> >
> >Hey, ya dumb ****!
>
> Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On 28 Nov 2005 14:36:03 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon"
<PENMART01@aol.com>
>
>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>> <Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>> >
>> >Hey, ya dumb ****!
>>
>> Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>
>Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids...
Guess again, assloaf --
douchebag
doucheˇbag (plural doucheˇbags)
noun
Definitions:
1. medicine syringe for vaginal cleansing: a syringe used for washing
out the vagina
2. offensive term: a highly offensive term that deliberately insults
somebody's appearance or character ( taboo )
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_5...definition.html
Now run along and don't be a douchebag, douchebag.
>you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
Quit talking to yourself.
Oh, and make sure you schedule those anger management classes STAT.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
jt wrote:
> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>
>>Cleopatra wrote:
>>
>>
>>>X-No-archive: yes
>>>
>>>Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>>>
>>>>In the spirit of the season:
>>>>
>>>>"Don we now our gay apparel,
>>>>Fa la la,
>>>>La la la,
>>>>La la la"
>>>
>>>Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
>>>
>>>Up my ass with AIDS injections
>>>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>>'Tis the season for infections
>>>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>>
>>>Don we now our gay diseases
>>>Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
>>>Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
>>>Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>>>
>>>Cleopatra
>>
>>The lear Creopatla would nevel have posted this!
>
> Could you try that again?
See above.
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Sheldon wrote:
> Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>
>><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>>
>>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>>
>>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>
>
> Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
|
|
|
| Sheldon |
Sparky Spartacus wrote:
> Sheldon wrote:
>
> > Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> >
> >><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
> >>
> >>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
> >>
> >>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
> >
> >
> > Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>
> And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
Sheldon Oxford
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On 28 Nov 2005 17:01:58 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon"
<PENMART01@aol.com>
>
>Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>> Sheldon wrote:
>>
>> > Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>> >
>> >><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>> >>
>> >>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>> >>
>> >>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>> >
>> >
>> > Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>>
>> And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
>
>You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Sheldon |
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> > <PENMART01@aol.com>
> >Sparky Spartacus wrote:
> >> Sheldon wrote:
> >> > Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> >> >><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
> >> >>
> >> >>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
> >>
> >> And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
> >
> >You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
>
> Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
Quit playing with yourself... can't your pea brain grasp the
concept...douche bag is two words!
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On 28 Nov 2005 18:38:28 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>> > <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>> >Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>> >> Sheldon the douchebag wrote:
>> >> > Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>> >> >><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>> >>
>> >> And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
>> >
>> >You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
>>
>> Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
>
>Quit playing with yourself...
Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
And start typing with both hands, douchebag.
>can't your pea brain grasp the
>concept...douche bag is two words!
Already disproven, douchebag.
I guess you were too embarrassed by your ****-up to leave that portion
of text in the post, douchebag.
Very transparent of you, douchebag.
Does your mommy know you're on her computer again, douchebag?
Happy FOAD, douchebag --
PS -- go buy a dictionary, douchebag.
It's obvious you don't have one, douchebag.
Maybe your aunt mom will buy you one for Xmas, douchebag.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Sheldon |
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2005 18:38:28 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
> douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>
>
> >Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> >> > <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
> >> >Sparky Spartacus wrote:
> >> >> Sheldon the douchebag wrote:
> >> >> > Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> >> >> >><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
> >> >>
> >> >> And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
> >> >
> >> >You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
> >>
> >> Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
> >
> >Quit playing with yourself...
>
> Quit talking to yourself,
The same faggot line twice in a row... you're not very creative, you
bore me.
Adios, mother****er (one word).
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .
Sheldon
|
|
|
| Rev._Bonnie_Bitch |
On 28 Nov 2005 19:56:47 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>
>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>> On 28 Nov 2005 18:38:28 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
>> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
>> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
>> douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>> Quit talking to yourself,
>
>The same faggot line twice in a row... you're not very creative, you
>bore me.
>
>Adios, mother****er (one word).
No, douichebag, that one's two words. You should really learn your
native and only language better than the non-native speaker to whom
you're obsessed with replying, douchebag.
Now run along, douchebag.
Your aunt mom's enema is getting cold, and you wouldn't want to ruin
your lunch, douchebag.
Happy FOAD, douchebag --
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Sheldon wrote:
> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>
>>Sheldon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>>>>
>>>>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>>>
>>>
>>>Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>>
>>And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
>
>
> You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
There you go again, projecting like crazy.
|
|
|
| Sparky Spartacus |
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2005 18:38:28 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
> douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>
>
>
>>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>>
>>>><PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>>>>Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Sheldon the douchebag wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>>>>>
>>>>>And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
>>>>
>>>>You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
>>>
>>>Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
>>
>>Quit playing with yourself...
>
>
> Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
> And start typing with both hands, douchebag.
Not that! If he stops abusing himself he's likely to start abusing other
people (assuming he can find some near his tree hut).
|
|
|
| Bonnie Bitch |
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:25:49 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Sparky
Spartacus <Sparky@universalexports.org>
>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>
>> On 28 Nov 2005 18:38:28 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
>> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
>> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Sheldon the
>> douchebag" <PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>>>
>>>>><PENdouchebagMARdouchebagT01@aol.douchebagcom>
>>>>>Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sheldon the douchebag wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bonnie Bitch wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><Let_Em_Eat_Indictments> says:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Hey, ya dumb ****!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hello, you fascist, projecting douchebag.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Get it right, twat... it's TWO (2) woids... you dumb dyke DOUCHE BAG!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And you know this how, Summer's Eve?
>>>>>
>>>>>You don't own a dictionary, you low IQ crotch cleaner.
>>>>
>>>>Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
>>>
>>>Quit playing with yourself...
>>
>>
>> Quit talking to yourself, douchebag.
>> And start typing with both hands, douchebag.
>
>Not that! If he stops abusing himself he's likely to start abusing other
>people (assuming he can find some near his tree hut).
Oh, ok. I retract what I wrote and replace it with:
Yo, Sheldon. You're a douchebag. FOAD.
May the Blessings of Gong Gong rain ubiquitously and reign supreme!
Rev. Bonnie Bitch, Universal Life Church
"Exorcising Usenet, one christstain at a time, since 2004"
|
|
|
| Paul Duca |
in article 1133116380.123941.48160@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, Cleopatra
at Let_Em_Eat_Indictments@hotmail.com wrote on 11/27/05 1:33 PM:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> Sparky Spartacus wrote:
>
>> In the spirit of the season:
>>
>> "Don we now our gay apparel,
>> Fa la la,
>> La la la,
>> La la la"
>
> Likewise in the spirit of the Season:
>
> Up my ass with AIDS injections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
> 'Tis the season for infections
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Don we now our gay diseases
> Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la.
> Troll the ancient Plague and sneezes
> Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la
>
> Cleopatra
>
While Cleo can't even get a man drunk enough to pull off her
panties...
Paul
|
|
|
|
