| Ubiquitous |
Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on Sandra
Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into her background. It
turns out that Lee is a Food Network star without any foodie credentials; she
got into showbiz, it seems, after developing a wide variety of home decorating
and scrapbooking products for QVC.
Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged ingredients in
every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good pumpkin pies from the grocery
bakery) appears to have been created out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can
place a bit more importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of
the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We have
some readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a well-coifed QVC host
made it onto Food TV?
--
"Bunny's ability to take ingredients that I love and put them together into
something stomach wrenching is unparalleled." -- bookwirm
|
|
|
| rox formerly rmg |
Her recipes are just a tiny bit more complicated than those on a site like
Kraft Kitchens.
A lot of it is probably about promoting products. I'm sure the third-party
food companies represented in her recipes probably pay or provide
sponsorships.
cheers
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:HLednZWPZeAih-fenZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
> Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>
> When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on Sandra
> Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into her background.
It
> turns out that Lee is a Food Network star without any foodie credentials;
she
> got into showbiz, it seems, after developing a wide variety of home
decorating
> and scrapbooking products for QVC.
>
> Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged
ingredients in
> every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good pumpkin pies from the
grocery
> bakery) appears to have been created out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting
can
> place a bit more importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the
rest of
> the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We
have
> some readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a well-coifed QVC
host
> made it onto Food TV?
>
>
> --
> "Bunny's ability to take ingredients that I love and put them together
into
> something stomach wrenching is unparalleled." -- bookwirm
>
>
|
|
|
| Nancy Young |
"rox formerly rmg" <roxmarie_nofriedspam42@pacbell.net> wrote
> Her recipes are just a tiny bit more complicated than those on a site like
> Kraft Kitchens.
>
> A lot of it is probably about promoting products. I'm sure the third-party
> food companies represented in her recipes probably pay or provide
> sponsorships.
You would think, except they don't show, or actually put fake, labels
on the food. Having said that, you sure can't miss the rotating color
KitchenAid mixers if you tried. One for every decor.
nancy
|
|
|
| Ubiquitous |
In article <dldcjo$obk$1@news.monmouth.com>, qwerty@monmouth.com wrote:
>"rox formerly rmg" <roxmarie_nofriedspam42@pacbell.net> wrote
>> Her recipes are just a tiny bit more complicated than those on a site like
>> Kraft Kitchens.
>>
>> A lot of it is probably about promoting products. I'm sure the third-party
>> food companies represented in her recipes probably pay or provide
>> sponsorships.
>
>You would think, except they don't show, or actually put fake, labels
>on the food. Having said that, you sure can't miss the rotating color
>KitchenAid mixers if you tried. One for every decor.
It's almost as if she sent Miss Stephanie out to raid Rachel Ray's pantry!
--
==================================================
====================
ISLAM: Winning the hearts and minds of the world, one bomb at a time.
|
|
|
| Pan Ohco |
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, Ubiquitous wrote:
>Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>
>When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on Sandra
>Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into her background. It
>turns out that Lee is a Food Network star without any foodie credentials; she
>got into showbiz, it seems, after developing a wide variety of home decorating
>and scrapbooking products for QVC.
>
>Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged ingredients in
>every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good pumpkin pies from the grocery
>bakery) appears to have been created out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can
>place a bit more importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of
>the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We have
>some readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a well-coifed QVC host
>made it onto Food TV?
You already gave the reason "cleavage"
She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
cooked.
Pan Ohco
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:ntgkn1hu69jj6ap90g805t11jlrest0t0s@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>>Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>>
>>When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on
>>Sandra Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into her
>>background. It turns out that Lee is a Food Network star without any
>>foodie credentials; she got into showbiz, it seems, after developing a
>>wide variety of home decorating and scrapbooking products for QVC.
>>
>>Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged
>>ingredients in every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good
>>pumpkin pies from the grocery bakery) appears to have been created out
>>of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can place a bit more importance on
>>cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of the stars on the Food
>>Network have real culinary training, either from prestigious culinary
>>schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We have some
>>readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a well-coifed QVC
>>host made it onto Food TV?
>
> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
> that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
> cooked.
>
>
> Pan Ohco
I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian friends.
I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
Michael
--
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Pan Ohco |
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:33:02 GMT, Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
>> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
>> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
>> that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
>> cooked.
>>
>>
>> Pan Ohco
>
>I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian friends.
>I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
>
>Michael
To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
lesbian is.
Pan Ohco
|
|
|
| Roy Knable |
In article <HLednZWPZeAih-fenZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@comcast.com>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> But the rest of
> the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies.
One other notable exception: Marc Summers of Unwrapped. Another
knucklehead who wouldn't know a spice from an herb. But at least he
doesn't cook on the show, he just smarmily narrates it.
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:1rikn1hsba2up4duk29uk3ig92qkdteu7r@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:33:02 GMT, Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
>
>
>>> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
>>> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
>>> that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
>>> cooked.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pan Ohco
>>
>>I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian
>>friends. I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
>>
>>Michael
>
> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
> lesbian is.
>
> Pan Ohco
Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's possible
that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian and shop at
hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite a few of my
friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power jobs, wear clothes
most women would kill for, drive expensive automobiles and live in big
houses. Some have children from failed marriages with men. In other words,
lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in society,
professional position and general physical appearance. Stereotyping comes
immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that make any sense?
Michael
--
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Roy Knable |
In article <1rikn1hsba2up4duk29uk3ig92qkdteu7r@4ax.com>, Pan Ohco
<ohco@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian friends.
> >I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
> >
> >Michael
>
> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
> lesbian is.
http://belladonna.org/lipsticklesbian.html
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
Roy Knable <roy@hellvision.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:151120051619283099%roy@hellvision.com:
> In article <1rikn1hsba2up4duk29uk3ig92qkdteu7r@4ax.com>, Pan Ohco
> <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian
>> >friends. I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
>> >
>> >Michael
>>
>> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
>> lesbian is.
>
> http://belladonna.org/lipsticklesbian.html
>
Interesting site but somewhat romanticized(sp... spellcheck messed up). I
was trying to be more precise to define the term in everyday life or
something similar to it. Like the lovely waitress that served up the veal
parmesan last night.
Micael
--
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Nancy Young |
"Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote
>> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
>> lesbian is.
> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
> possible
> that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian and shop at
> hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite a few of my
> friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power jobs, wear clothes
> most women would kill for, drive expensive automobiles and live in big
> houses. Some have children from failed marriages with men. In other
> words,
> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in society,
> professional position and general physical appearance. Stereotyping comes
> immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that make any sense?
Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
nancy
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
"Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:dldk7u$s0f$1@news.monmouth.com:
>
> "Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
>
>> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote
>
>>> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
>>> lesbian is.
>
>> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
>> possible
>> that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian and shop
>> at hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite a few of
>> my friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power jobs, wear
>> clothes most women would kill for, drive expensive automobiles and
>> live in big houses. Some have children from failed marriages with
>> men. In other words,
>> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
>> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in
>> society, professional position and general physical appearance.
>> Stereotyping comes immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that
>> make any sense?
>
> Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
>
> nancy
Was it accurate? I think it was an okay but certainly not perfect.
Michael
--
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Nancy Young |
"Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
> "Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote
>>> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
>>> possible
>>> that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian and shop
>> at hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite a few of
>> my friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power jobs, wear
>> clothes most women would kill for, drive expensive automobiles and
>> live in big houses. Some have children from failed marriages with
>> men. In other words,
>> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
>> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in
>> society, professional position and general physical appearance.
>> Stereotyping comes immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that
>> make any sense?
>> Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
> Was it accurate? I think it was an okay but certainly not perfect.
I knew what you meant, so it sounded just right to me. How about
this for an extreme example? The two cheerleaders in the bathroom?
I haven't seen a picture, but I'm sure they were picked because of
their male attracting appearance.
Oh, and I'd bare with you, but I know I'm not your type. (smile)
nancy
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
"Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:dldl8u$seb$1@news.monmouth.com:
>
> "Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
>
>> "Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote
>
>>>> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
>>>> possible
>>>> that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian and shop
>>> at hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite a few of
>>> my friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power jobs, wear
>>> clothes most women would kill for, drive expensive automobiles and
>>> live in big houses. Some have children from failed marriages with
>>> men. In other words,
>>> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
>>> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in
>>> society, professional position and general physical appearance.
>>> Stereotyping comes immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that
>>> make any sense?
>
>>> Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
>
>> Was it accurate? I think it was an okay but certainly not perfect.
>
> I knew what you meant, so it sounded just right to me. How about
> this for an extreme example? The two cheerleaders in the bathroom?
> I haven't seen a picture, but I'm sure they were picked because of
> their male attracting appearance.
>
> Oh, and I'd bare with you, but I know I'm not your type. (smile)
>
> nancy
Oh hell, let's bare anyway. Harmless and fun ;)
Michael
--
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| sjb56@charter.net |
Didn't I read somewhere that "The Wallet" recently filed for divorce
from Semi-HoMaid Sandra Lee? Or did I imagine it? Is that why she's
been looking "three sheets to the wind" lately?
Just wondering...
Back to lurking.
SusanB in GA
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, weberm@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
wrote:
>Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>
>When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on Sandra
>Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into her background. It
>turns out that Lee is a Food Network star without any foodie credentials; she
>got into showbiz, it seems, after developing a wide variety of home decorating
>and scrapbooking products for QVC.
>
>Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged ingredients in
>every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good pumpkin pies from the grocery
>bakery) appears to have been created out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can
>place a bit more importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of
>the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We have
>some readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a well-coifed QVC host
>made it onto Food TV?
|
|
|
| barry in indy |
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:OLGdnayjLd4BqufeRVn-qA@comcast.com...
>
> It's almost as if she sent Miss Stephanie out to raid Rachel
> Ray's pantry!
>
Oh, if I had the chance to raid Rachel's pantry...
--
barry in indy
|
|
|
| Nancy1 |
sjb56@charter.net wrote:
> Didn't I read somewhere that "The Wallet" recently filed for divorce
> from Semi-HoMaid Sandra Lee? Or did I imagine it? Is that why she's
> been looking "three sheets to the wind" lately?
> Just wondering...
> Back to lurking.
> SusanB in GA
>
>
Yup, they're getting divorced. The Wallet is joining with Martha's
Omnimedia to do something with The Wallet's construction venture, like
decorating the homes or something like that.
N.
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
"Nancy1" <nancy-dooley@uiowa.edu> looking for trouble wrote in
news:1132157906.079154.273540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> sjb56@charter.net wrote:
>> Didn't I read somewhere that "The Wallet" recently filed for divorce
>> from Semi-HoMaid Sandra Lee? Or did I imagine it? Is that why she's
>> been looking "three sheets to the wind" lately?
>> Just wondering...
>> Back to lurking.
>> SusanB in GA
>>
>>
> Yup, they're getting divorced. The Wallet is joining with Martha's
> Omnimedia to do something with The Wallet's construction venture, like
> decorating the homes or something like that.
>
> N.
I wonder if he got tired of Trailer Tacky (with money) and climbed the
fence for the Deb With Dough????
Michael
--
....Bacteria: The rear entrance to a cafeteria.
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Syssi |
"barry in indy" <barrynospam-news@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:l_Cef.321$Ba6.278@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
> news:OLGdnayjLd4BqufeRVn-qA@comcast.com...
>>
>> It's almost as if she sent Miss Stephanie out to raid Rachel Ray's
>> pantry!
>>
>
> Oh, if I had the chance to raid Rachel's pantry...
>
> --
> barry in indy
> ==============
Barry... did you mean to type "pantry" or "panty"?
Sorry... stupid cold does weird things to my sense of humor.
--
Syssi
|
|
|
| Nick |
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote in
> news:ntgkn1hu69jj6ap90g805t11jlrest0t0s@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>> Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>>> Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>>>
>>> When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on
>>> Sandra Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into
>>> her background. It turns out that Lee is a Food Network star
>>> without any foodie credentials; she got into showbiz, it seems,
>>> after developing a wide variety of home decorating and scrapbooking
>>> products for QVC.
>>>
>>> Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged
>>> ingredients in every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good
>>> pumpkin pies from the grocery bakery) appears to have been created
>>> out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can place a bit more
>>> importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of the
>>> stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>>> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food
>>> companies. We have some readers with industry knowledge: anyone
>>> know how a well-coifed QVC host made it onto Food TV?
>>
>> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
>> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
>> that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
>> cooked.
>>
>>
>> Pan Ohco
>
> I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian
> friends. I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
FYI: We like her and her ginormous swinging boobies.
Seriously, if she wasn't attractive I wouldn't watch.
|
|
|
| Nick |
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> "Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote in
> news:dldk7u$s0f$1@news.monmouth.com:
>
>>
>> "Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
>>
>>> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote
>>
>>>> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
>>>> lesbian is.
>>
>>> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
>>> possible that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian
>>> and shop at hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite
>>> a few of my friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power
>>> jobs, wear clothes most women would kill for, drive expensive
>>> automobiles and live in big houses. Some have children from failed
>>> marriages with men. In other words,
>>> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
>>> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in
>>> society, professional position and general physical appearance.
>>> Stereotyping comes immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that
>>> make any sense?
>>
>> Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
>>
>> nancy
>
> Was it accurate? I think it was an okay but certainly not perfect.
Can I give it a go?
A lipstick lesbian is a lesbian who gets whistled at when she passes a
construction site.
|
|
|
| Nancy1 |
Nick wrote:
>
> FYI: We like her and her ginormous swinging boobies.
> Seriously, if she wasn't attractive I wouldn't watch.
I caught a rerun last weekend - her "white" scape. Honestly, I don't
see how it could have been any fakier. Then, to top it off, she
evidently thought all the white on the set washed her out, so she
overdid the eye makeup and ended up looking like a raccoon. Ick.
N.
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
Nick <nickSPAMMENOT@snurcher.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:Xns971C8FDFEB144ndtcm@204.153.244.170:
> Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
>
>> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote in
>> news:ntgkn1hu69jj6ap90g805t11jlrest0t0s@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>
>>>> Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>>>> Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>>>>
>>>> When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible "recipes" on
>>>> Sandra Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I delved a bit into
>>>> her background. It turns out that Lee is a Food Network star
>>>> without any foodie credentials; she got into showbiz, it seems,
>>>> after developing a wide variety of home decorating and scrapbooking
>>>> products for QVC.
>>>>
>>>> Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought, pre-packaged
>>>> ingredients in every dish, even if you're gutting perfectly good
>>>> pumpkin pies from the grocery bakery) appears to have been created
>>>> out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can place a bit more
>>>> importance on cleavage than actual experience. But the rest of the
>>>> stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>>>> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food
>>>> companies. We have some readers with industry knowledge: anyone
>>>> know how a well-coifed QVC host made it onto Food TV?
>>>
>>> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
>>> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this group,
>>> that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember what she
>>> cooked.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pan Ohco
>>
>> I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick lesbian
>> friends. I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
>
>
> FYI: We like her and her ginormous swinging boobies.
> Seriously, if she wasn't attractive I wouldn't watch.
That's so cool Nick. We can keep her threads going that way. For most, at
least I think, she is a brainless twit than can not cook. She go on her
show for money from her paycheck. JMO though.
Michael
--
....Bacteria: The rear entrance to a cafeteria.
All gramatical errors and misspellings due to Ramsey the cyber kitten. He
now owns all keyboards and computing devices in the household and has the
final say on what is, or is not, posted.
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
"Nancy1" <nancy-dooley@uiowa.edu> looking for trouble wrote in
news:1133208685.673239.318260@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> Nick wrote:
>>
>> FYI: We like her and her ginormous swinging boobies.
>> Seriously, if she wasn't attractive I wouldn't watch.
>
> I caught a rerun last weekend - her "white" scape. Honestly, I don't
> see how it could have been any fakier. Then, to top it off, she
> evidently thought all the white on the set washed her out, so she
> overdid the eye makeup and ended up looking like a raccoon. Ick.
>
> N.
The makeup... I swear... My Snowshoe cat looks more appealing.
Michael
--
....Bacteria: The rear entrance to a cafeteria.
All gramatical errors and misspellings due to Ramsey the cyber kitten. He
now owns all keyboards and computing devices in the household and has the
final say on what is, or is not, posted.
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Michael \Dog3\ Lonergan |
Nick <nickSPAMMENOT@snurcher.com> looking for trouble wrote in
news:Xns971C903C055F7ndtcm@204.153.244.170:
> Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
>
>> "Nancy Young" <qwerty@monmouth.com> looking for trouble wrote in
>> news:dldk7u$s0f$1@news.monmouth.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" <dog3@invalid.com> wrote
>>>
>>>> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote
>>>
>>>>> To each his own Michael. But could you explain what a "lipstick"
>>>>> lesbian is.
>>>
>>>> Pick any cover of any model magazine or any fashion magazine. It's
>>>> possible that person is a Lesbian. Not all lesbian's speak lebesian
>>>> and shop at hardware stores. I'm trying here, so bare with me. Quite
>>>> a few of my friends are lipstick lesbians. They have high power
>>>> jobs, wear clothes most women would kill for, drive expensive
>>>> automobiles and live in big houses. Some have children from failed
>>>> marriages with men. In other words,
>>>> lipstick lesbians are women one would just automatically assume are
>>>> heterosexual by their physical and mental attributes, position in
>>>> society, professional position and general physical appearance.
>>>> Stereotyping comes immediately to mind, only in reverse. Does that
>>>> make any sense?
>>>
>>> Heh, I was waiting to see how you'd explain that one. Funny.
>>>
>>> nancy
>>
>> Was it accurate? I think it was an okay but certainly not perfect.
>
>
> Can I give it a go?
>
> A lipstick lesbian is a lesbian who gets whistled at when she passes a
> construction site.
>
I think you have that confused with anyone looking female passing a
construction site. I've been whistled at myself while driving a
convertible.
Michael
--
....Bacteria: The rear entrance to a cafeteria.
All gramatical errors and misspellings due to Ramsey the cyber kitten. He
now owns all keyboards and computing devices in the household and has the
final say on what is, or is not, posted.
Send email to dog30 at charter dot net
|
|
|
| Nick |
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> Nick <nickSPAMMENOT@snurcher.com> looking for trouble wrote in
> news:Xns971C8FDFEB144ndtcm@204.153.244.170:
>
>> Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
>>
>>> Pan Ohco <ohco@hotmail.com> looking for trouble wrote in
>>> news:ntgkn1hu69jj6ap90g805t11jlrest0t0s@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:28:31 -0600, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Posted Nov 3, 2005, 9:09 AM ET by Sarah Gilbert
>>>>> Filed under: Talent, Food/Home/DIY, Cable
>>>>>
>>>>> When I started ranting on Slashfood about the terrible
>>>>> "recipes" on Sandra Lee's Semi-Homemade Halloween special, I
>>>>> delved a bit into her background. It turns out that Lee is a
>>>>> Food Network star without any foodie credentials; she got into
>>>>> showbiz, it seems, after developing a wide variety of home
>>>>> decorating and scrapbooking products for QVC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Her "ingenious 70/30 philosophy" (70% storebought,
>>>>> pre-packaged ingredients in every dish, even if you're gutting
>>>>> perfectly good pumpkin pies from the grocery bakery) appears
>>>>> to have been created out of whole cloth. Sure, TV casting can
>>>>> place a bit more importance on cleavage than actual
>>>>> experience. But the rest of the stars on the Food Network have
>>>>> real culinary training, either from prestigious culinary
>>>>> schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies. We have
>>>>> some readers with industry knowledge: anyone know how a
>>>>> well-coifed QVC host made it onto Food TV?
>>>>
>>>> You already gave the reason "cleavage"
>>>> She is a good looking woman, and as mentioned before in this
>>>> group, that if she cooked naked, none of the men would remember
>>>> what she cooked.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pan Ohco
>>>
>>> I don't think she's attractive at all. Nor do my lipstick
>>> lesbian friends. I don't know about the str8 guys out there.
>>
>>
>> FYI: We like her and her ginormous swinging boobies.
>> Seriously, if she wasn't attractive I wouldn't watch.
>
> That's so cool Nick. We can keep her threads going that way. For
> most, at least I think, she is a brainless twit than can not cook.
> She go on her show for money from her paycheck. JMO though.
Oh, I agree with your assessment too.
|
|
|
| Ubiquitous |
In article <151120051615324115%roy@hellvision.com>, roy@hellvision.com
wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> But the rest of
>> the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies.
>
>One other notable exception: Marc Summers of Unwrapped. Another
>knucklehead who wouldn't know a spice from an herb. But at least he
>doesn't cook on the show, he just smarmily narrates it.
And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
whatever that countdown show is called.
--
"Bunny's ability to take ingredients that I love and put them together into
something stomach wrenching is unparalleled." -- bookwirm
|
|
|
| Nancy Young |
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote
> In article roy@hellvision.com wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> But the rest of
>>> the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either from
>>> prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food companies.
>>
>>One other notable exception: Marc Summers of Unwrapped. Another
>>knucklehead who wouldn't know a spice from an herb. But at least he
>>doesn't cook on the show, he just smarmily narrates it.
>
> And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
> whatever that countdown show is called.
That's Bobby Rivers (?), not Al Roker. I believe Al does cook and
has a cookbook or two out.
nancy
|
|
|
| Nick |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.food-network,rec.food.cooking
X-Trace: DXC=:V^B\kfT5cAMmcO[Q`]VAEbQ9W< K20`3BO6Gh9bA988Nlnm2aE32[Q@ReUDhHlBKLGCoe[@CdjoVE
fT5EU=fAJjG03o>\Ik;@_@
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Nov 2005 07:37:37 CST
Xref: spool6-east.superfeed.net rec.arts.tv:866064 alt.tv.food-network:6962 rec.food.cooking:1134084
Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article <151120051615324115%roy@hellvision.com>,
> roy@hellvision.com wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> But the rest of
>>> the stars on the Food Network have real culinary training, either
>>> from prestigious culinary schools or restaurants and gourmet food
>>> companies.
>>
>> One other notable exception: Marc Summers of Unwrapped. Another
>> knucklehead who wouldn't know a spice from an herb. But at least he
>> doesn't cook on the show, he just smarmily narrates it.
>
> And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
> whatever that countdown show is called.
Not all black people are Al Roker.
|
|
|
| Ubiquitous |
nickSPAMMENOT@snurcher.com wrote:
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
>> whatever that countdown show is called.
>
>Not all black people are Al Roker.
Well, that's an interesting leap of logic...
--
"Bunny's ability to take ingredients that I love and put them together
into something stomach wrenching is unparalleled." -- bookwirm
|
|
|
| Bob Terwilliger |
Ubiquitous missed the point again:
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>> And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
>>> whatever that countdown show is called.
>>
>>Not all black people are Al Roker.
>
> Well, that's an interesting leap of logic...
Al Roker doesn't host ANY countdown show. "Top 5" is hosted by Bobby
Rivers. You probably mistook him for Al Roker because they're both black
men.
NOW do you understand?
Bob
|
|
|
| Ubiquitous |
nickSPAMMENOT@snurcher.com wrote:
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> And then there's Al Roker, assuming he still hosts "Top Five", or
>> whatever that countdown show is called.
>
>Not all black people are Al Roker.
Well, that's an interesting leap of logic...
--
"Bunny's ability to take ingredients that I love and put them together
into something stomach wrenching is unparalleled." -- bookwirm
|
|
|
|
